http://yedda.com/questions/Historical_proofs_bible_science_vs_5041876710768/?src=rss:qb:qbsHistorical proofs in the bibleen-ushttp://static1.yeddacdn.com/images/Logo132X46_rmt9c1d22d.jpghttp://yedda.com/questions/Historical_proofs_bible_science_vs_5041876710768/?src=rss:qb:qbsHistorical proofs in the biblehttp://yedda.com/questions/Historical_proofs_bible_science_vs_5041876710768/?src=rss:qb:qbi<p>what is the beast that is spoken of in the BIBLE and also was there really a unicorn also spoken of in the BIBLE and are there archcaoligical proofs?</p>rayraymale62questionMon, 01 Jun 2009 17:26:10 GMThttp://yedda.com/questions/Historical_proofs_bible_science_vs_5041876710768/?src=rss:qb:qbihttp://yedda.com/questions/Historical_proofs_bible_science_vs_5041876710768/info_beast_question_nbsp_referring_186137233711921?src=rss:qb:qbi<p>Not enough info on the "beast" question:  are you referring to the "beast" of which the number was "666" (actually, it was the number "616" in earliest fragments we have) ?   If so, then the 666 beast is Nero and the 616 beast is Caligula.   As for the "unicorns" , what do you expect from a gay 17th century Limey King ?  Actually, James didn't translate it, he just paid for it.  Most modern Biblical scholars agree that it is a mistranslation of "re'em" and should be " wild ox".  The bible has enough mistakes and contradictions without piling on some that aren't really there.</p>tyrebitretyrebitre62answer3.0Tue, 02 Jun 2009 02:30:19 GMThttp://yedda.com/questions/Historical_proofs_bible_science_vs_5041876710768/info_beast_question_nbsp_referring_186137233711921?src=rss:qb:qbi