Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

American Patriot — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:09:08 GMT

1 Will the Israelis bomb Iran?
2 Who's side will Obama be on?
3 Who's side will American's be on?

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

Capt. Conservative — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 13:51:26 GMT

1 Will the Israelis bomb Iran? I believe if the UN is ineffective as usual and talks with the United States fail, Israel will certainly put their Country first. Especially if Iran continues firing test rockets and making threats. My only hope is that Obama has the "balls" to back them.

2 Who's side will Obama be on? What's sad is ... I don't know. I mean in all honesty, I wasn't a fan of Bill Clinton, but I don't believe he hated this Country, like I feel Obama does. I don't feel Obama has the Country's best interest at heart, I think he has his own interests at heart.

3 Who's side will American's be on? Americans will always side with Israel. They have been by our side for generations, and a great ally.

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

Capt. Conservative — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 13:56:52 GMT

Right Now ... I'd Love to Have Benjamin Netanyahu as our President.

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

GWObama — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 16:37:03 GMT

I seriously hope it doesn't come to Israel having to bomb Iran. They must however defend themselves. If Mexico was a rogue country as Iran is and they had the capability to send a nuclear missle at the US, do you think we would stand idly by? Especially if Mexico had promised to wipe us off the face of the earth as Iran has threatened against Israel? The only way I see Obama sideing with Israel is if Israel suddenly became a Communist or Muslim country. The American people I think would be split 50-50 in sideing with Israel.

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

Pat — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 16:59:54 GMT

At this time we really don't know what Barack Insane Obama will do. He was more interested in securing the olympics in 2016 for Chicago than he was in taking care of the country that he was elected to do. I really don't think that Israel can trust Obama to help them. I feel the same as the French president. Obama is nieve and he thinks more of himself than our country and the world thinks of him. As I have said before, how could the American people put someone like Obama in control of our country. He had no experience at all and he thought that he could make his speeches and all would fall at his feet. The man needs a lot of help from a shrink.

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

Whirlwindflower — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 17:59:37 GMT

I still am a little confused on this, so have not added my answer. There is Israel, there is the Muslims(Arabs)living in the settlements of part of Jerusalem, and Jews living in the original land with Muslims wanting all of Jerusalem. Israel is supposed to be given to the Jews, but it has been encroached upon.

Our Lord Jesus was a Jew, but they the Pharisees murdered him, and the bible states that they will be persecuted until they cry out to him as their Savior. So I don't know the answer to this. Also much of Obama's staff and government are Jews.

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

dfrogpong — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 18:08:10 GMT

, i can just not imagine how someone can be such a loser as unamerican patriot. i have never met anyone whos only accomplishment in life is giving themselves helpful answers. do you realize the time it takes every day to post all those articles/ it takes 5 times as much time to get yourself that that many helpful answers. it fascinates me how sick a person has to be to pick some thing so meaningless to fool themselves into thinking they are successful.

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

dfrogpong — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 18:18:18 GMT

obama will back Israel and do whats best for our country. he will make the right decisions for our national security. unlike like the idiot we had has president the last 8 years bush. not only did he let our country get attacked he attacked the wrong country in iraq. his failed foreign policies allowed afghanistan to regroup and let north korea and iran to continue to develop their nuke programs. the american people should feel much safer now that we have an intellect in office and not the idiot that just left.

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

Nanadee — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 18:57:12 GMT

SORRY WILDFLOWER, BUT I STICK BY MY STATEMENT, YOU OR B.O. CAN'T  " TAKE MY FREEDOM OF SPEECH AWAY" OR CHOICE OF WORSHIP.

THAT IS MY GOD GIVEN RIGHT TO SAY AS I WANT WHEN IT COMES TO GOD OR ANYTHING NICE OR MAKE A STATEMENT.

THAT IS MY GOD GIVEN RIGHT TO GO TO THE CHURCH OF MY CHOICE.

THAT IS MY GOD GIVEN RIGHT TO HAVE MY BIBLE IN MY HOME AND TO READ IT AND TO CARRY IT ANYWHERE I WANT.

NO GOVERNMENT WILL EVER TAKE THAT AWAY FROM ME.   AMEN

I DON'T KNOW WHERE YOU LIVE BUT HERE IN FLORIDA, WE STILL HAVE OUR RIGHTS ....FREEDOM OF SPEECH   VOTE   AND WORSHIP. I HAVEN'T HAD THAT TOOK FROM ME OR OTHERS SO HOW CAN YOU SAY THAT

. (( Government took our rights, )) ????

Wildthing
Yes you read it wrong. (( Government took our rights, )) God gave us those rights. We the people are soveriegn, government is not.

GOD BLESS

NANADEE

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

Voice of Reason — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 19:42:13 GMT

Thanks AP, for your question.

The Israeli's have shown great restraint in recent years. In the first gulf war, Desert Storm, even though they were being rocketed by scud missles, they held back from attacking. This was a condition imposed by countries like Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Jordan to join the coalition.

In the second gulf war, Iraqi Freedom, they aided in intelligence as did France and England regarding WMD's but once again did not strike out since this would widen the conflict and further destabilize the area.

This time, as others here have pointed out here, they may have no choice and can not be faulted for this. A nuclear Iran would be a very dangerous entity. I think the US will supply intelligence and logistic support but I don't think Obama will become involved. He will let Israel do the dirty work so he doesn't look "bad".

In general, the American people will back Israel. I believe most people see the Israeli's as very brave people reminiscent of how we used to be when American's were proud to be American not embarassed. When common sense was more pronounced. When love for our country was a virtue not a fault to be criticized and ridiculed.

For "dfrogpond", the reason no one can take you seriously is because you invent your own reality. The reason we went into Iraq the first time was because they invaded Kuwait, remember. The reason we went in the second time was their expansion of their military, repeated violations of the cease fire agreement, infringement of the no-fly zone and the combined French, British and Israeli intelligence on WMD's (which were convoyed out of Iraq to Syria just before the onset of the allied invasion as evidenced by satellite surveillance) and Saddam's stubborn refusal to allow free access and travel of the IAEA inspectors. Yes, allied invasion, we had at least 12 other countries along side of us, inspite of what the media wanted you to believe!

After 9/11 we DID invade Afghanistan and did quell and defeat the Taliban. They fled to Pakistan regrouped and with the help of heroin money gradually re-entered the Afghan mountains. I suppose you forgot the celebration on the same soccer field where just months before men and women were beaten and beheaded!!!

"Common sense is not so common", Voltaire

"The trouble ain't that people are ignorant, it's that they know so much that ain't so", Josh Billings

"Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it", Mark Twain

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

lawbug — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 20:01:04 GMT

1 – I think Israel will take whatever action is required at the time that they believe it is required to assure the safety of their citizens regardless of any opinion outside of Israel…And for that I have infinite respect for them.

2 – President Obama is, in my opinion, a Muslim and his sympathies are for Islam and its supporters regardless of their national origin, therefore he will perform in opposition with Israel if they take action against Iran or any other Muslim oriented nation…I pray he doesn’t go so far as to actually take military action against Israel if they defend their citizens.

3 – Most Americans, I believe, subscribe to President Bush’s position that everyone in the world is “either with us or against us”…The old adage “Enemies of my enemies are my friends” describes the majority of Americans’ feelings regarding our support of Israel.

Personally my thought Obama was a TV star we see his face more than any outher President in history. In fact i thought he is an actor on TV not the president of the USA and Just think we AMERICANS just paid him to go to Copenhagen Denmark and MS OBAMA her jet flight there at tax payers expense for the purpose of 2012 olympics is this necessary.

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

Nanadee — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 20:21:07 GMT

well put voice of reason

god bless

nanadee

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

Nanadee — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 23:57:37 GMT

Eagleburger: Use Military Option on Iran
Friday, October 2, 2009 10:49 AM

By: Jim Meyers Article Font Size

Former Secretary of State Lawrence Eagleburger says the U.S. should be prepared to take military action to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, because "if we don't stop it now, we'll never stop it."
Eagleburger held his Cabinet post under President George H.W. Bush and also served in other positions under Presidents Nixon, Reagan and Carter. He sat down with Fox News Channel's Greta Van Susteren on Thursday night to discuss the meeting in Switzerland between Iran, the U.S. and five other nations.
Asked if he has any hopes that the meeting will be productive, Eagleburger responded: "I have no expectations or high hopes for it. I just don't think anything's going to come of it because I don't think Iran intends any sort of compromise...
"My own guess is, at this stage, when it's over, Iran will have built its bomb."
Eagleburger told Van Susteren that if he had been in a position to act, "I would have made it very clear to the Chinese and the Russians that if they didn't join us in meaningful sanctions, we were going to hold it against them in every way we could."
Asked who he would prefer to negotiate with, the Chinese or the Russians, Eagleburger said "the Chinese" because "they'd be more rational."
He continued: "I would do my best to get sanctions that would really make a difference because I think, in fact, if you imposed the right kinds of sanctions, we probably could force the Iranians to stop it. If on the other hand that didn't work, I myself believe that it's worth military action to stop it. I would go whatever way is necessary."
But Eagleburger, who is now Chairman of the Board of Trustees for The Forum for International Policy, also said he does not believe the Obama administration will be willing to take required military action.
"I don't think this administration is ever going to be prepared do that, so I don't think we'll do it. But I think the issue is so important that it needs to be stopped.
"Where the real mistake was made was to permit the North Koreans to do it. Once they had accomplished this matter of getting a bomb, you open the door wide. If we had made it clear from the very beginning that we were not going to tolerate another nuclear power on the face of the earth, and had done it in Korea, where we could have accomplished it militarily, if necessary, [it] would have put a stop to it there...
"We're going to have some nuclear nation sometime along the way that's going to pop off a bomb, and then where will we be? I don't know. I think it's a mess, and I don't like the way it's going."
Van Susteren asked why Eagleburger believes the Obama administration won't take action.
"This administration doesn't look at things that way," he said.
"I'm not sure there's much of any administration that would look on it this way, although I think there are some who understand that this is an issue not just of Iran but of the whole future of the world, if you will, and that if we don't stop it now, we'll never stop it."
He added ominously: "The consequence of a world full of nuclear powers to me is so incomprehensible in terms of the dangers that that implies. One nuclear war is going to be the last nuclear — the last war, frankly, if it really gets out of hand. And I just don't think we ought to be prepared to accept that sort of thing."


RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

Whirlwindflower — Sat, 03 Oct 2009 00:13:17 GMT

1 Will the Israelis bomb Iran?   I'm sorry American, but the Israelis .........people that live in Israel are arabs and Jews. No do not think the Jews will start the war. Think they in essense will be attacked.

2 Who's side will Obama be on? his Arab brothers

3 Who's side will American's be on? The American's will stand beside the true Jews those who believe in Christ.

The Jews actually crucified  Jesus, but many believed in him. Many did not recognize him as the Son of God and Christ the Messiah..............(just as Islam does not recognize him as anything other than a prophet.)

From the words of the Bible with Jesus speaking them:

Luke 13 King James

34O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, which killest the prophets, and stonest them that are sent unto thee; how often would I have gathered thy children together, as a hen doth gather her brood under her wings, and ye would not!

35Behold, your house is left unto you desolate: and verily I say unto you, Ye shall not see me, until the time come when ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord.

Luke 21 King James Version

The Destruction of Jerusalem


20 “But when you see Jerusalem surrounded by armies, then know that its desolation is near. 21 Then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains, let those who are in the midst of her depart, and let not those who are in the country enter her. 22 For these are the days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be fulfilled. 23 But woe to those who are pregnant and to those who are nursing babies in those days! For there will be great distress in the land and wrath upon this people. 24 And they will fall by the edge of the sword, and be led away captive into all nations. And Jerusalem will be trampled by Gentiles until the times of the Gentiles are fulfilled.

Revelation 11:2
But the court which is without the temple leave out, and measure it not; for it is given unto the Gentiles: and the holy city shall they tread under foot forty and two months.
Revelation 11:1-3 (in Context) Revelation 11 (Whole Chapter)

Nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom. 11 And there will be great earthquakes in various places, and famines and pestilences; and there will be fearful sights and great signs from heaven. 12 But before all these things, they will lay their hands on you and persecute you, delivering you up to the synagogues and prisons. You will be brought before kings and rulers for My name’s sake. 13 But it will turn out for you as an occasion for testimony. 14 Therefore settle it in your hearts not to meditate beforehand on what you will answer; 15 for I will give you a mouth and wisdom which all your adversaries will not be able to contradict or resist. 16 You will be betrayed even by parents and brothers, relatives and friends; and they will put some of you to death. 17 And you will be hated by all for My name’s sake. 18 But not a hair of your head shall be lost. 19 By your patience possess your souls.

The Coming of the Son of Man


25 “And there will be signs in the sun, in the moon, and in the stars; and on the earth distress of nations, with perplexity, the sea and the waves roaring; 26 men’s hearts failing them from fear and the expectation of those things which are coming on the earth, for the powers of the heavens will be shaken. 27 Then they will see the Son of Man coming in a cloud with power and great glory. 28 Now when these things begin to happen, look up and lift up your heads, because your redemption draws near.”

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

finabiscotti — Sat, 03 Oct 2009 02:22:39 GMT

I am for ISRAEL.

Isreal is prepared to strike Iran - if needed. Israel will be bombing Iran - since obama is such a CLoWn - as a Leader and peacemaker.

It bothers me how Obama discredits Israel, and speaks bad of our long-time ALLY.

Considering how obama degrades the United States of America - on foreign soil, I believe the world gets the picture that Obama is not good for our country -

and is the reason that the pro-obama media in America puts forth such propoganda - on behalf of THE OBAMAS - to give the false impression to the world that all is well in the US - when it is not.

Obama is a TRAGEDY that has happened to America - with his sheer arrogance, inexperience and ignorance - that has caused America to lose the title of Leader of the Free World. The fact that Obama is a USURPER - makes him even more dangerous - in the global environment.

No one can depend on obama - since it is becoming clear that obama's word is no good, no substance, shallow, disloyal to his own country - if obama was to be considered a legitimate president - and is a puppet of power - devised to manipulate Americans for the sheer hell of it - because of our FREEDOMS.

Because of this, I believe Israel is taking the position - it would have to bomb Iran.

The fact that Sarkozy as the President of France was asked not to address all what his country was intending to present to the United Nations - discussing the nuclear arsenal of North Korea and Iran -

as it was stated - it would interfere with obama's "debut" before the United Nations -

indicates the Obama Administration is way out of control, out of touch with reality - unconcerned about global needs - and is placing everyone - in the world - in jeopardy -

trying to maintain the malignant, pathological narcissistic Myth -

of Mubarack HUSSEIN Obama - as a Pretender to the Throne - the Trojan Horse.

An example of obama and his administration is to focus on bringing the Olympics to Chicago - instead of focusing on what is needed in Afghanistan.

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

richard — Sat, 03 Oct 2009 04:21:58 GMT

Ok whirlwindflower would like me to answer this again; so according to Daniel 11: the King of the south {persia} which is Iran will desolate Israel,AND THE KINGF OF THE SOUTH WILL pUSH AT THE KING OF THE NORTH, and the kING OF THE NORTH {GERMANY } WILL COME WILL WASTE IRAN, now germany and the pope will come into Isreal { you have to have some knowledge that charlmaign[wrong spelling] and the pope were the first roman empire Or HOLY ROMAN EMPIRE} , and this will be the seventh resurrection of the Holy roman empire that goes on to the Holy of Holys and causes the massive abominations spoken of in the word. so will Israel bomb IRan? to me it is yes as I believe that Iran already has nukes and has one planted in Israel at this very time, but is looking for the excuse to blast it. as Iran doesnt want the world to attack it for wasteing Israel but when Israel attacks; Iran will do it.

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

ferencz999 — Sun, 04 Oct 2009 05:29:11 GMT

SORRY to say BAD THINGS are coming their way...IRAN and also ISRAEL the MIDEAST is a TINDERBOX filled with NUKES and ISRAEL will GO FIRST to get IRAN...they are FIGHTERS and were a HOLOCOST PEOPLE ONCE I promise they will NOt allow again.....Netanyanu is no fool and Obama best not as well dumb ass hillary take them for fools they give not a sh&^ what either of those two appologists THINK OR WANT as far as Israel is concerned OBAMA and HILLARY can GO TO HELL! The whole world will be a devasted mess when this happens the oil supply will be completley down and Obama and his commie buds will be telling us all to get those damn wind millls...there is documented info that there is enough oil that has not been drilled in this country out west to last 100s of years..the greens are FURIOUS!!!! I say DROP KICK EM! THERE will be no US of A anymore due to OBAMA and his antics he is in so FAR OVER HIS HEAD he does not know his ass from his face! I respect NETANYANYU more then OBAMA 1000 times more..he has a set to put it mildly and will not tolerate Bullshit from any lunatic! Sorry for the vulgarness but I cant help myself feel that strong about the whole mess...PLUS all the ISLAM RADS are here in teh states and it is just a matter of time WE WILL HAVE WARFARE ON OUR STREETS!!!! The OBAMA ADMISITRATION can PLAY FOOLS all they want BUT THE MAJORITY OF THINKING AMERICANS ARE VERY AWARE!!!!!! Look at all the MOSQUES POPPING up ALL OVER they are HUGE DOMED OASIS..and most think LOTS of BAD GOES ON ABOUT PLANS for US!

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

ferencz999 — Sun, 04 Oct 2009 05:39:10 GMT

Pope John Paul II warned of THIS in not EXACT words but in his book BE NOT AFRAID he spoke in detail of ISLAM and how they are not GOD beleivers...Muhammad rode into paradise on a horse named BAROK....he did not quote that I did..Muhammeds daughters name was "FATIMA" in 1917 OUR LADY OF FATIMA appeared in FATIMA PORTUGAL....there was the miracle of the sun where the sun was falling from the sky it wa seen for many many miles and miles..GOOGEL THIS YOU WILL FIND SITES TO GO TO ....The CATHOLIC PHILOSOPHY is that it is NO COINCIDENCE that our lady appeared in FATIMA...she is the FORERUNER to CHRIST and will after much suffering of all on earth convert ISLAM to Christianty....'BE NOT AFRAID" JP IIs quote and I must live by it HE was a PROPHET for our times....HIS BOOKS ARE DEEP BUT VERY MUCH WORTH THE TIME TO READ! GOD HELP US we are in for much suffering!!!!

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

finabiscotti — Sun, 04 Oct 2009 06:30:00 GMT

The obama administration is the laughing stock of the world - especially with his grisly wife - having her fag focus on bringing the Olympics to Chicago - an EPIC FAIL -

instead of focusing on the war in Afghanistan.

The fact that Sarkozy as the President of France - the Leader of the Free World -

was pressured by the obama administration - during the UN conference/assembly - to not address the nuclear arsenal of North Korea and Iran - because it would ruin obama's "debut" before the United Nations!

If Obama does not step down as the acorn-vote-rigged President of the United States - because of his delusions - he is incapable of serving - and "ineligible" to serve as a USURPER -

there will be no world left - for obama to aspire to be the Leader of the World - in his delusion of a One World Government - the New Weird Order.

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

finabiscotti — Sun, 04 Oct 2009 06:39:37 GMT

The following is something that I found that is both sickening about Obama - as well as enlightening - as it gives insight into why obama leaves Americans and the United States of America wide open for attack:

Sympathy for the Devil October 1st, 2009

The American Thinker: Sympathy for the Devil
By Robin of Berkeley

How concerned should we be about Obama? Is he a potential dictator with a weird cult following who could destroy this country?
To put it more bluntly, does Obama have the potential for inflicting evil on us? Or, if he’s a puppet, are the ones holding the strings malevolent?
These may be the most crucial and urgent questions of our times. Is Obamaphobia a legitimate reaction to an angry president with a vendetta, surrounded by psycho czars? Or is the imagination running amok?
Given that I have a stack of books on my desk about evil, let’s take a look at how the experts define it.

Dante: Evil is the “sins of the wolf;” an inner black hole so vast that nothing will fill it.

Psychologist Philip Zimbardo, The Lucifer Effect: “Evil consists in intentionally behaving in ways that harm, abuse, demean, dehumanize, and destroy innocent others — or using one’s authority and systemic power to encourage or permit others to do so on your behavior.”

Philosopher Hannah Arendt: She coined the term the “banality of evil,” after Nazi mastermind Adolf Eichmann was pronounced normal by psychiatrists.

Psychiatrist M. Scott Peck, People of the Lie: “Evil people are chronic scapegoaters.”

St. Augustine: Evil is “an essential nothingness.”

Ralph Waldo Emerson: “An absence of light; shade; no essence.”

Goethe: Evil is “to render invisible another human consciousness.”

Baudelaire: “The Devil’s cleverest wile is to convince us he doesn’t exist.”

John Milton: “A tortured soul who makes others dance to the music of his own despair.”

But to discern evil, we need to go beyond the guidance of the experts. We must decide with our own eyes, ears, and nose, whether a person passes the “stink test.”

Humans possess an extraordinary sixth sense — our intuition. St. Jerome called intuition, “synderesis:” an infallible God-given ability to distinguish between good and evil.

Yet, we’re told not to trust our gut because it’s not nice to be judgmental. In these politically correct days, where everybody is good, even terrorists, we’re supposed to dismiss our intuition, shove it underground, lest we offend anyone.

Thus, if Obamaphobia gives us insomnia, headaches, or the heebie jeebies, it’s all in our heads. We’re being paranoid.

But isn’t this how the Soviets dealt with dissidents? The leaders labeled them paranoid, and then had their fiendish psychiatrists forcibly drug, shock, and hospitalize them.

As the expression goes: you’re not paranoid if someone is following you.

Criminologist Gavin De Becker, in his seminal work, The Gift of Fear, urges us to never ignore our intuition. Most of the time, victims sense that their attacker is a threat but ignore this inner knowing.

De Becker’s wise words:

Can you imagine an animal reacting to the gift of fear the way some people do, with annoyance and disdain instead of attention? No animal in the wild, suddenly overcome with fear, would expend any of its mental energy thinking, “It’s probably nothing.” . . . We, in contrast to every other creature in nature, choose not to explore — and even ignore — survival signals.

I think that deep down most of us know who is good and who is evil — who will bring joy and who will usher in disaster.

Because many of us have been touched by evil at some point in our lives. And it changes you; it pierces your soul. Because you behold something so startling it leaves you breathless: that there are people, sometimes in your own family, who wish you harm.

People ask me how I could go from Left to Right so quickly, and I’ve written about the main factors. But, now that I contemplate evil, I realize I left out the pivotal reason.

It’s because I saw evil up close and personal starting from a young age. And when you’re exposed to danger when you’re little, and you don’t push it away or blame yourself, something essential in you is altered; you’re able to see what many others conceal.

I saw this darkness first in the devilish laughter of my brother when he realized we were alone in the house and he could terrorize me.

And I saw it again in my middle school, where the liberal experiment of forced busing unleashed a torrent of hate and mayhem. When roars of “f—cking white bitch,” and assaults and fondling were as commonplace as English class.

And when I moved to squalid New York City in the late 70’s, during the reign of Mayor Dinkins, I saw it in the uncontrolled assaults on the citizen’s bodies and souls.

I saw it on the streets of Berkeley when, on a perfect, blue sky day, a man smiled that same devilish grin before he mugged me, breaking my nose and blackening my eyes.

And when a friend glossed over my mugging because the assailant was black (”He’s a victim too,”), I saw evil there.

I’ve seen it professionally in the face of the man who molested all five of his children; and in the visage of his wife, who chose to stay with him and was pregnant once again.

And now that I’m writing for American Thinker, I see it in some of the trolls, although not all of them. Some are just jerky people who write drivel like, “I just wasted five minutes of my life,” and “You’re a fake.”

No, I’m talking about the people who post comments aimed not at disagreeing or offering an alternative viewpoint. They’re designed to destroy my humanity.

They can’t defend Obama, so they go after me. They call me paranoid or narcissist. They accuse me of throwing my dead parents under the bus. Or of betraying my Jewish ancestors by embracing other religions, like Christianity.

Or this bile: the person who wrote that she/he’s glad I’m writing because it’s therapeutic, since obviously I’m psychologically disturbed and could be a danger to society.

Fortunately I’m a therapist so I know who these people are. I can diagnose them a mile away. I’ve worked with them before, although each time, they chill me to the bone.

Having some hate spewed in my direction, I think of Sarah Palin and the wilding she endured.

And I think she resigned because, when her church was torched, her body ogled and threatened, and her children debased, she looked into the face of evil.

She saw something so dark and blood curdling that she did what any God fearing, God loving person would do: she put up her hands, yelled “Stop,” and got out of there as fast as she could.

Because evil is the most dangerous of the toxins. It can harden, and infect, and change a person before he or she knows it. Evil desecrates the places inside that are holy and sacred.

More and more, each day, I smell the stench of wickedness. It’s omnipresent in our government, and it’s spreading like wildfire throughout the land, threatening everyone in its path.

M. Scott Peck so eloquently captures the consequences of evil in high places: “The evil create for those under their dominion a miniature sick society.”

We have a man who has been privileged with the greatest honor, the Presidency, and what does he do? Does he demonstrate an ounce of gratitude or humility?

No, he betrays us in the most profound way possible: by not protecting and defending us.

Obama is doing to the American people just what his caregivers did to him when they dragged him around like a rag doll, and exposed him to a pervert like Frank Marshall Davis. Now Obama’s a rage doll who’s throwing us to the wolves.

People claim Obama isn’t a serious threat because his personality is not like Mussolini or Che. He doesn’t have the fire in his belly to be a true dictator.

But I will share with you a surprising truth I learned after working in the child abuse field: severe neglect is even more traumatic than serious physical abuse (not sexual abuse, though). People can be mortally wounded by crimes of omission.

Abuse is terrible but at least the abuser cares enough to pay attention, to know the child is alive. With neglect, the people who should care, don’t give a damn; leaving the child abandoned and unguarded in a perilous world.

What worries me the most about Obama is this: the part of him that should want to shield us from harm seems chillingly absent.

The economy is tanking — Obama laughs. We are accumulating crippling debt — he and the other Democrats go on a spending spree.

Millions take to the street for a peaceful 9/12 march. He doesn’t notice. We oppose the government controlling our lives, especially health care, but he rams legislation down our throats anyway.

Our allies have started to realize that Obama doesn’t care about them either. He snubs Gordon Brown, returns a statue of Winston Churchill (how disturbing is this?), and insults the Brits with DVDs and iPods. He betrays the Poles and the Czechs, and leaves Israel hanging from a limb.

Obama does have sympathy for the devils, though, the Chavez’s and Castro’s of the world. Maybe he views them as brothers, fellow victims of the monstrous United States. Perhaps Obama is all Vive le Revolucion.

There are endless red flags, aren’t there? The covert government of antisocial Czars; the cozy ties to Bill Ayers, maybe George Soros. And who knows what else, because Obama’s private world has been hermetically sealed.

So is this what am I saying: that President Bare Heart is at the helm, with a bunch of loose cannons possibly running the show? That he’s giving a wink-wink to miscreants both here and abroad?

That the New Weird Order is starting to unhinge the already unbalanced, and bring new, vulnerable people, into its fold?

That Obamaphobia is real, and we ignore it at our peril?

Yes.

But don’t listen to me. Don’t listen to anyone: not the mental midgets who call you “racist;” not your brother in law who says you’re nuts; not the Talking Heads who paint you as stupid trash.

Pay attention to no one, to nothing, except the light of truth revealing itself to you.

“Truth crushed to the earth will rise again:” William Cullen Bryant

American Thinker archive for author: Robin is a recovering liberal and a psychotherapist in Berkeley.

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

dfrogpong — Sun, 04 Oct 2009 14:45:02 GMT

i have met and know people from all walks of life. fiscal conservatives, born agains. i have never met anyone expect for the people on these websites that display the mental illness and insanity displayed by you far right social conservatives and your religious cult. the lies, hate and fear you people spread his not only sick its a disgrace. the paranoia and lack of education is why you people are considered dangerous. the sad part is you justify your hate because you think you are doing it in the name of God. may God help you people.

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

finabiscotti — Sun, 04 Oct 2009 20:34:38 GMT

Iran's President: Obama Made a Big Mistake
Saturday, October 3, 2009 8:25 AM

TEHRAN, Iran – Iran's president said Saturday that President Barack Obama made a big mistake when he accused the country of hiding a newly revealed nuclear site that Iran claims it reported to the U.N. even earlier than required.

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's comments came only hours before the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Mohamed ElBaradei, arrived in Iran to arrange an inspection of the uranium enrichment facility near the holy city of Qom.

Iran agreed to allow U.N. inspectors into the facility at a landmark meeting with six world powers near Geneva on Thursday that put nuclear talks back on track and included the highest-level bilateral contact with the U.S. in three decades.

Special: Get Sarah Palin’s New Book – Incredible FREE Offer -- Click Here Now.

But the new site has raised concerns among the U.S. and many of its allies who suspect Iran of using its nuclear program as a way to develop weapons capability — an allegation rejected by Tehran.

El Baradei recently said Tehran was "on the wrong side of the law" over its new plant because he argued the country should have revealed its plans as soon as it decided to build the facility — a position backed by the U.S.

Iranian officials disagree, saying that under IAEA safeguard rules, a member state is required to inform the agency about the existence of a nuclear facility six months before introducing nuclear material into the machines. Iran says the new facility won't be operational for 18 months, so Iran has not violated any IAEA requirements.

Ahmadinejad said Iran voluntarily revealed the facility to the IAEA in a letter on Sept. 21, four days before Obama and the leaders of France and Britain denounced Tehran for hiding the nuclear site from the world for years.

"The U.S. president made a big and historic mistake," Iranian state TV quoted Ahmadinejad as saying during a speech Saturday. "Later it became clear that (his) information was wrong and that we had no secrecy."

The IAEA has said that Iran is obliged under the Additional Protocol to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty to notify the organization when it begins to design a new nuclear facility.

Iran says it voluntarily implemented the Additional Protocol for 2 1/2 years as a confidence-building gesture, but it's parliament passed legislation in 2007 forcing the government to end such cooperation after the country was referred to the U.N. Security Council for sanctions over its refusal to suspend uranium enrichment.

The IAEA has countered by saying that a government cannot unilaterally abandon such an agreement.

Suspicion that Iran's newly revealed nuclear site was meant for military purposes was heightened by its location at least partly inside a mountain and next to a military base.

Iran has said it built the facility in such a way only to ensure continuity of its nuclear activities in case of an attack.

ElBaradei arrived in Iran on Saturday to meet with Iranian officials, state radio reported.

An IAEA spokesman said that in addition to the new nuclear facility, ElBaradei will also discuss a plan to allow Russia to take some of Iran's enriched uranium and enrich it to higher levels to fuel its research reactor in Tehran.

Western officials said Iran agreed to the plan at Thursday's meeting, a potentially significant move that would show greater flexibility by both sides.

Obama noted the deal in comments on the meeting. But Mehdi Saffare, Iran's ambassador to Britain and a member of the Iranian delegation at the talks, said Iran had not yet agreed to such a plan.

There's obama - LYING - again!

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

dfrogpong — Mon, 05 Oct 2009 15:16:35 GMT

unamerican patriots aka dawg aka captain idiot aka tigersabortooth aka gollum aka many multiple accounts. even these far right wackos would admit your are sick and need help if it wasnt for the fact that you are one of them. if you spent as much time looking for a job as you do posting hundreds of articles a day then spending hours giving yourself helpful answers you would be off of government assistance.

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

dfrogpong — Mon, 05 Oct 2009 15:40:33 GMT

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

dfrogpong — Mon, 05 Oct 2009 15:42:04 GMT

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

dfrogpong — Mon, 05 Oct 2009 15:44:43 GMT

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

dfrogpong — Mon, 05 Oct 2009 15:48:58 GMT

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

finabiscotti — Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:12:40 GMT

Obama bowing to the Saudi King - had a prpose - his willingness to serve:

Emirates Leader Signs Law to Develop Nuclear Power
Monday, October 5, 2009 6:55 AM

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates -- The president of the energy-hungry United Arab Emirates has signed a law regulating the development of a civilian nuclear program, clearing the way for construction of a nuclear power plant with help from the United States.

Washington has promoted its plan to help the Emirates' develop peaceful nuclear power as a model of the kind of cooperation it would like to achieve with Iran, which the U.S. and its allies suspect is using a civilian program as a cover to develop an atomic weapons capability.

The United Arab Emirates, which is just across the Persian Gulf from Iran, is among those Arab nations wary of Iran's nuclear work.

UAE President Sheik Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan signed into law the regulatory framework for building "a peaceful nuclear energy sector," the country's official news agency reported Sunday.

The law complies with regulations of the U.N.'s International Atomic Energy Agency, the state-run WAM news agency said.

Under those guidelines, the UAE will be prohibited from developing its own program to enrich uranium or reprocess spent nuclear fuel. Both of those technologies are potential pathways to developing nuclear weapons.

The U.S. and the other permanent members of the U.N. Security Council, as well as Germany, are trying to persuade Iran to stop enriching uranium to ease concerns that it could use that process to build weapons.

Iran says it only wants to use enrichment for peaceful purposes like nuclear power and medical research.

In May, President Barack Obama approved plans to help the UAE develop nuclear power to meet its growing demand for electricity in its boomtowns of Dubai and Abu Dhabi.

Under the pact, the UAE must import, rather than produce, fuel for its nuclear reactors. It also has committed not to enrich uranium or reprocess spent nuclear fuel into plutonium, which is used in nuclear bombs.

The U.S. Congress has until Oct. 17 to pass legislation either amending or rejecting the deal. If no bill is passed, the agreement goes into effect. The pact would run for 30 years and allow the U.S. to transfer nuclear equipment, reactors and materiel for civil nuclear research to the UAE.

Concerns have been raised about the UAE's history as a transshipment point for material intended for Iran's nuclear program.

Critics of the deal have also pointed to al-Qaida and other terrorist groups use of financial networks in the UAE to launder money.

They say that, while the UAE has taken steps to combat terrorist financing and tighten its export control laws, it is too soon to enter into such a major deal.

However, representatives of the Obama administration have assured critics that the UAE is a trusted ally in the Gulf and will adhere to nonproliferation rules.

We already know obama's WORD is NO GOOD - from his ELECTION PROPOGANDA.

Obama's speech in Cairo, Eqypt - addressing the Arab and Muslim world -had more to it then inviting everyone to come to America - the land of great opportunities, our doors (borders) will always be open to you.

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

dfrogpong — Mon, 05 Oct 2009 22:17:01 GMT

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

dfrogpong — Mon, 05 Oct 2009 22:31:43 GMT

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

dfrogpong — Tue, 06 Oct 2009 00:17:29 GMT

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

dfrogpong — Tue, 06 Oct 2009 00:31:09 GMT

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

dfrogpong — Tue, 06 Oct 2009 00:33:40 GMT

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

IamQweenBee — Tue, 06 Oct 2009 07:23:04 GMT

1 Will the Israelis bomb Iran? Or do you mean will the Iranians bomb Israel? That's the way I heard it on the news. I hope not, but, it seems they are doing what many people here are...which is trying to set off a bomb. LOL

2 Who's side will Obama be on? Of course the President will be on the side of America...which is on Israel's side. Against Israel is usually also against America . LOL

3 Who's side will American's be on? America has always had Israel's back. I think some Americans won't just to spite the President. Which is SAD and self-destructive!! LOL

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

finabiscotti — Wed, 07 Oct 2009 05:02:18 GMT

OBAMA is AGAINST ISRAEL -

the liberal Loons know this - but yet post FALSE information - to create CONFUSION - intending to give the false impression - when Obama is not on the side of Israel.

Obama is supporting the Palestinians - other than the interests of our ally, Israel.

Obama is supportive of LIBYA and IRAN.

Pelosi is against ISRaEL, our ally.

Pelosi is supportive of SYRIA.

Americans are against countries that provide safe havens for terrorists.

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

Nanadee — Wed, 07 Oct 2009 10:48:44 GMT

FINABISCOTTI

THUMBS UP. BO ISN'T FOR ANYTHING GOOD. I THINK. HE IS SHOWING IT MORE AND MORE. WE KNEW THIS, BUT HE HAD SOME FOOLED, NOT ME THO. I DONT LIKE ANYONE THAT WONT LOOK YOU IN THE EYE WHILE THEY ARE TALKING TO YOU WHICH HE DONT. AND HE STAMMERS IF SOME ONE DONT TELL HIM WHAT TO SAY WHEN ASKED A QUESTION AND LOOKS AROUND FOR THE ANSWER. WE KNEW THAT ALREADY AND THOSE THAT " DID NOT "   KNOW IT ARE FINDING OUT AT LAST. THANK GOD.   HE SHOULD JUST ADMIT DEFEAT AND MOVE TO IRAN. WHERE HE CAN HAVE SUPPER WITH THEM. OR BE SOME BIG SHOT IN AFRICA., WHERE HE IS FROM. NO , I DONT DEPEND ON HIM FOR NOTHING. EXCEPT LIES. I DONT EVEN WATCH A T.V. PROGRAM HE IS ON CAUSE IT UPSETS ME TO HEAR HIM TALK. I GET NEWS ABOUT HIM FROM OTHER PLACES. I PRAY THAT AMERICANS STICK BY ISRAEL, I KNOW I WILL. 100%. AND KEEP THEM IN MY PRAYERS.

GOD BLESS OUR TROOPS THAT ARE TRYING TO KEEP OUR LAND FREE.

NANADEE

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

dfrogpong — Wed, 07 Oct 2009 21:35:14 GMT

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

dfrogpong — Wed, 07 Oct 2009 21:44:00 GMT

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

dfrogpong — Wed, 07 Oct 2009 21:58:26 GMT

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

dfrogpong — Wed, 07 Oct 2009 22:07:53 GMT

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

Kid — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 16:29:57 GMT

God gave us a great example lesson when the serpent's seed came to take Jesus for crucifixion : Matt 26:52 "Then said Jesus unto him, Put up again thy sword into his place: for all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword: Remember God's words in Gen 4:15 "DON'T KILL CAIN". Jesus said to Peter, DON'T KILL CAIN'S CHILDREN. Thus, we are to IDENTIFY them, TEACH truth against them, resist wholly by the word of GOD, but to otherwise LEAVE THEM ALONE. As we see the New World Order of the Kenites come into existence right before our eyes, we would do well to remember and to follow Jesus' example. Let God do the physical fighting. He has promised He would. "IT IS WRITTEN,VENGEANCE IS MINE, I WILL REPAY, Saith the LORD". (Rom 12:19)

Within the seedline of Adam, we see ALL the great men of God to the birth of the promised one- JESUS the Messiah, the SON OF GOD. One is tempted to stop the seedline with Jesus, but God's Word doesn't. You see, there have been many forks in the seedline. At each of these forks, the Kenites have done their best to destroy it. They did not succeed, nor will they ever. We see one fork with the story of Noah. The second fork was with Noah's children.

Another major one was with Peleg. The one we are most familiar with was Abraham, then Isaac,and finally Jacob and Esau. The story of the seedline from Abraham is probably the one that is most misunderstood. Some commentary-educated theologists call Abraham a Jew.Some call him an Israelite. Very few know that Abraham was a Hebrew (Gen. 14:13). He was neither an Israelite nor a Jew, for Israel (Jacob) was his grandson, and Judah was his great-grandson! Do we not see from this that the children of Abraham were all Hebrews? Do we forget that Abraham had SEVEN sons OTHER than Isaac? (Gen 16:16), Gen 25:1-2). ALL these and their offspring are Hebrews, but NONE of these are either Israelites nor Jews. You see, God promised Abraham that Abraham's offspring would be numbered as the sand of the sea, the stars of heaven (Gen 22:17), and the dust of the earth(Gen 13:16) These predictions yield startling conclusions to thinking persons.

Lets see now: "the sand of the sea". Hmm... Isn't that the place that John saw the Beast rise from? SURE IS. Rev 13:1 "And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy." (KJV) How about "the dust of the earth"? Hmmm.. Don't we read that in Gen. 3:14? SURE DO "And the LORD God said unto the serpent, Because thou headstone this, thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and DUST SHALT THOU EAT all the days of thy life: (KJV)Satan's little ones eat everything we produce, or at least they try to.How about "the stars of heaven"? HMMM...yessss.. Daniel 12. Jesus tells Daniel to seal the book but the wise shall understand. in Dan 12:3 we find" And they that be wise shall shine as the brightness of the firmament; and they that turn many to righteousness as the stars for ever and ever. (KJV)

Thus we see God's prediction that most of Abraham's seed would do the work of the Kenite, by being deluded into worshiping the ways of this world. I say most, for it is probable that the combination of the dust of the earth and the sand of the seashore vastly out number the 'stars of heaven'. Something to think about anyway. It would not be proper to leave the subject of Adam's seed without pointing out something else. Namely, God promised that Abraham's seed would Gen. 22:17-18: 17 That in blessing I will bless thee, and in multiplying I will multiply thy seed as the stars of the heaven, and as the sand which is upon the sea shore; and thy seed shall possess the gate of his enemies; 18 And in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed; because thou hast obeyed my voice. (KJV)

God passed this promise to Jacob when he changed his name to Israel Gen 28:14 "And thy seed shall be as the dust of the earth, and thou shalt spread abroad to the west, and to the east, and to the north, and to the south: and in thee and in thy seed shall all the families of the earth be blessed." (KJV) Who passed it to Josephs children, Ephraim and Manasseh in Gen 48: 16 The Angel which redeemed me from all evil, bless the lads; and let my name be named on them, and the name of my fathers Abraham and Isaac; and let them grow into a multitude in the midst of the earth. 17 And when Joseph saw that his father laid his right hand upon the head of Ephraim, it displeased him: and he held up his father's hand, to remove it from Ephraim's head unto Manasseh's head. 18 And Joseph said unto his father, Not so, my father: for this is the firstborn; put thy right hand upon his head. 19 And his father refused, and said, I know it, my son, I know it: he also shall become a people, and he also shall be great: but truly his younger brother shall be greater than he, and his seed shall become a multitude of nations. 20 And he blessed them that day, saying, In thee shall Israel bless, saying, God make thee as Ephraim and as Manasseh: and he set Ephraim before Manasseh. (KJV)

Notice especially verse 16 "LET MY NAME BE NAMED ON THEM"!! WHO?? Ephraim and Manasseh, that's WHO. Joseph's children are ISRAEL, which in the Hebrew is 'the people of GOD' Look it up. Now man tells you that THE JEWS are God's people. But as you can see from the first verse of Gen 49, it is Jacob who blesses Judah and the rest of the tribes. The WORD is showing us that his Blessing name of Israel has already been given away: TO EPHRAIM AND MANASSEH. Now these promises God gave Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob are absolutely wonderful, and are physical, national blessings. If you listen to man, he will tell you it is the Jews that got them. Such trash. You would have to believe God lied to believe that. No, my friend, look at the nations of the earth today. You should be able to find God's people. They would be the ones who would be a blessing in the earth to other nations; They would possess the gates of their enemies'. They would be a Christian nation. They would feed the earth with their bounty. They would have vast natural resources. They would spend time and effort to send missionaries into the earth. They would be the envy of all nations. Hmmm. Look in the mirror, and give God thanks.

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

OdintheANTIGENOCIDEwhiterabbit — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 22:58:29 GMT

Pray for peace, pray for Putin!

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

OdintheANTIGENOCIDEwhiterabbit — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 23:24:41 GMT

Why should we be on any side except our own side?   Hillel said, "Who am I if I am not for myself."

Our interests are not israels interests and vice versa. Let us unite ourselves so we can see clearly what is in the interest of our nation. the people that really rule this world fear ethnic unity.

Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, White Countries for Everybody

The Netherlands is more crowded than Japan, Belgium is more crowded than Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve the RACE problem by bringing in millions of third-worlders and assimilating and intermarrying with them.

Everybody says the final solution to the RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to bring in the third world and assimilate with them.

Immigration, tolerance, and especially assimilation are being used against the white race.

All this immigration and intermarriage is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries.

In effect, all this immigration and intermarriage is a policy of genocide against the white race.
www.nationalsalvation.net

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

dfrogpong — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 00:53:54 GMT

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

dfrogpong — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 00:55:33 GMT

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

dfrogpong — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 00:56:50 GMT

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

dfrogpong — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 01:16:41 GMT

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

dfrogpong — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 01:18:27 GMT

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

dfrogpong — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 01:21:37 GMT

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

dfrogpong — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 01:27:11 GMT

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

finabiscotti — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 02:45:00 GMT

Israeli Foreign Minister: Obama Peace Effort Delusional

Thursday, October 8, 2009 4:25 AM

JERUSALEM -- Israel's powerful foreign minister declared Thursday that there is no chance of reaching a final accord with the Palestinians any time soon, casting a pall over the U.S. Mideast envoy's latest effort to get peace talks moving again.

Peacemaking policy in Israel is decided by the prime minister's office, and not the foreign ministry. But Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman carries significant weight in Israeli decision-making, and his is a sentiment common among confidants of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

President Barack Obama brought Netanyahu and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas together in New York last month in an effort to jumpstart talks that broke down months ago. So far, no breakthroughs have been announced.

Special: Get Sarah Palin’s New Book – Incredible FREE Offer -- Click Here Now.

Since the New York summit, U.S. envoy George Mitchell met with representatives of Netanyahu and Abbas in the United States, and returned to the region this week. He was to meet with Lieberman and Defense Minister Ehud Barak on Thursday and has sitdowns planned with Netanyahu and Abbas for Friday.

Israeli media reported that a Mitchell aide told Israeli journalists Wednesday that the enovy's visit was not likely to conclude with an announcement on talks resuming.

Lieberman told Israel Radio on Thursday that anyone who thinks the two sides can soon reach a deal ending their decades-old conflict "doesn't understand the situation and is spreading delusions."

What the two sides should do, he said, was to come up with a long-term interim arrangement that would ensure prosperity, security and stability, and leave the tough issues "to a much later stage."

This approach runs counter to U.S. efforts to reach an Israeli-Palestinian peace deal quickly. Obama has declared that establishing a Palestinian state alongside Israel is a vital U.S. interest. Also, Israel would not find a Palestinian partner for putting off a resolution to the conflict indefinitely.

Lieberman's view does not bode well for U.S. attempts to restart negotiations.

Mitchell has been laboring for months to pressure Israel to curb settlement construction. Israel has agreed to limited and temporary restrictions on building in the West Bank, but has resisted a total freeze. It has rejected any limitations on construction in east Jerusalem.

The Palestinians want the West Bank and east Jerusalem for part of their future state, along with the Gaza Strip, now ruled by Islamic Hamas militants.

Abbas has said repeatedly that he wouldn't go back to the negotiating table without a freeze. He also demands that talks begin where they broke off, with a promise from Israel that all issues will be on the table. Netanyahu has said he wouldn't be bound by the previous Israeli government's actions.

Abbas could be hard-pressed to back down now that he's dropped efforts to bring Israel before a war crimes tribunal in connection with its winter war in the Gaza Strip.

Nearly 1,400 Palestinians were killed in the war, including hundreds of civilians. Israel, which lost 13 civilians and soldiers in the war, launched the campaign to end years of Hamas rocket fire on Israeli border towns.

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

dfrogpong — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 16:38:03 GMT

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

dfrogpong — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 19:23:22 GMT

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

The Judge Says: — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 21:26:55 GMT

The Judge Says:

"We're no longer a Christian nation."
-- President Barack Obama

You have probably heard about President Barack Obama's speeches in foreign countries lately -- and some of the outrageous things he has been saying.

He stated on one trip that America is "no longer a Christian nation" -- but it still is .

If it concerns you that President Obama is telling the world that we are "no longer a Christian nation," I hope you will join me in launching a very special campaign to reclaim our heritage .

The evidence is clear that our Founding Fathers built our nation on Judeo-Christian principles .

In fact, I've written a book about it that I would like to send you .

I'll tell you more about that in a minute...

I think you know where I stand.

Like President John Adams , I believe that "Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other."

But many on the Left are willfully ignoring the First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of religion .

For instance, a legal battle to remove "In God We Trust " from U.S. currency is underway in the courts.

Far-left judges are ordering the Ten Commandments out of courthouses .

And Obama's administration is reversing the "Conscience Rule" to protect doctors and nurses who refuse to perform abortions due to religious reasons.

That's not what our Founding Fathers intended by separation of church and state .

But don't just take my word for it.

The evidence that our Founding Fathers built America on Judeo-Christian principles is written on nearly every building, memorial and monument in our Nation's Capital.

In my search for proof, I found scripture and religious references etched or engraved on some of the most important buildings in Washington, D.C.

For example, did you know that:

"Holiness to the Lord" is engraved into a tribute block of the Washington Monument .

A sculpture of Moses with the Ten Commandments appears over the east portico of the Supreme Court .

"The heavens declare the glory of God " (Psalm 19:1) is engraved on a wall of the Library of Congress .

And a heartfelt prayer from President John Adams is carved into the stone fireplace in the White House State Dining Room : "I pray to heaven to bestow the best of blessings on this house and all that hereafter inhabit it."

These are just a few of the many examples of Judeo-Christian imagery you'll find in our Nation's Capital.

Tourists visiting Washington, D.C. see them every day.

Yet President Barack Obama lives in the White House... and pretends they aren't there .

In fact, buried inside Obama's trillion-dollar stimulus package was anti-Christian legislation that would have stopped students of faith from using public schools for worship meeting or student Bible study groups .

Perhaps someone should remind the Obama Administration that members of Congress used to hold church services -- right in the U.S. Capitol building !

My friend, that someone is you and me .

Americans of faith need to know what's at stake.

Our Founding Fathers lived by those same values -- in fact, they prayed openly for our nation and even declared national days of prayer and fasting.

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

dfrogpong — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 22:42:00 GMT

watch unamerican patriots aka dawgs helpful answers rise. it started the day with 1109. this person is totally sick. everyone on yedda knows this wacko gives helpful answers to itself but nut job still keeps giving them to itself. less than 3 weeks ago it had 742. i guess in in its failure of a life giving itself helpful answers is the only thing it has ever accomplishe

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

dfrogpong — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 22:43:38 GMT

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

dfrogpong — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 22:46:09 GMT

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

dfrogpong — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 22:47:37 GMT

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

dfrogpong — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 22:48:19 GMT

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

dfrogpong — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 22:49:13 GMT

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

finabiscotti — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 21:58:59 GMT

All the Far Left Wingnuts have - is to disrupt any and all discussions about Obama and his wingnut DICTATORSHIP - acorn-vote-rigged presidency -

by bringing up the previous administration - OFF TOPIC -

as the means to interfere with EVERYONE's enjoyment of the Yedda services.

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

dfrogpong — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 01:40:47 GMT

lo ser

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

dfrogpong — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 01:42:03 GMT

l oser

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

dfrogpong — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 02:41:17 GMT

loser

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

finabiscotti — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:33:10 GMT

OBAMA'S PROPOGANDA STEALS "PEACE" PRIZE

the Rest of the FREE WORLD sees OBAMA as a Joke!

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/15601
"Educate Yourself: Agenda 21 and the Club of Rome"
However, obama's plan to destroy the United States of America - as a means to force a One World Government is not a Joke.

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/15601

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

finabiscotti — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 19:53:28 GMT

Evidently PUPPETRY is a major issue with dfrogpong/pattyp - needing to disrupt any and all discussions on the information posted - by TROLLING -

that always gets people banned on other websites.

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

dfrogpong — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 20:04:49 GMT

loser

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

finabiscotti — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 06:36:46 GMT

In the "hope" for a "change" - Obama might be on the side of the road - hitch-hiking or in the gutter - or running down Pennsylvania Avenue - being chased out of the White House - along with his grisly wife - by "we the people":

THIS IS KARMA FOR SLIMEBALLS!

(hat tip P7)

http://www.divine-way.com/forgery_evidences_sss_reg_colb_birth_cert_for_obama_impeachment.html
FORGERY EVIDENCES - SSS Reg.- COLB - BIRTH CERTIFICATE- FOR OBAMA IMPEACHMENT
Forgery of SSS Reg., RIMS HISTORY, Certificate of Live Birth (COLB):
No Security Clearance or Eligibility To Be President
Conclusive, convicting, and easily verified evidence is included here showing that President Barack Hussein Obama should be removed from office immediately and impeached. He has not shown identity and supporting evidence to have security clearance to be president, though he controls the military, has increased high military personnel in his administration, and has authority over nuclear and other secret and/or technical armaments, information and plans.
By his own hands and/or with his direction and/or consent has attained the office of President of the United States by conspiracy, deceit, fraud, lies, forgery, misrepresentation and withholding required documents proving his eligibility to be president. He has conspired for deceit and fraud and used lies, fraud, forgery and deceit knowing that he would not be elected if his true identity, associations and ineligibility were known.
The US Constitution: Article I Section 4:
"The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors."
While Senator, Barack Obama, by himself and/or his associates, conspired and fraudulently fabricated and forged his Selective Service System Registration form, related HIMS HISTORY inquiry screen and Certificate of Live Birth (COLB) documents, and tampered with United States Postal Service date stamp and presented them to deceive the voters of the United States of America, implying that he was eligible to become President of the United States and to gain control of the United States government. These are Federal high crimes and misdemeanors at the very least.
While Senator, Barack Obama, by himself and/or his associates, he hid and/or made inaccessible, and/or denied access, and/or refused access to documents that could prove his identity and eligibility or ineligibility to be President of the United States for the purpose of deceiving voters of the United States of America to gain control of the United States government with lies, fraud and deceit. Barack Obama has spent over $800,000 to hide his identity, refusing petitions through courts. He refusing access to a full birth certificate, medical records, passport and school records, proving he fully believes there is something to hide.
He allowed himself to take an oath before the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court that he would faithfully protect, defend and preserve the Constitution of the United States at the very time he refused to prove he was eligible to be president according to the law. of the Constitution. He has perverted the election procedure, and acquired access to and authority over classified and military information, technology and plans without security clearance procedures or proper identification. These are high crimes and misdemeanors bordering on treason and creat a high priority situation to immediately remove and then impeach President Barack Hussein Obama. II.
Barack Hussein Obama II is causing a hardship on our court system. There are several lawsuits to present evidence of eligibility and they are expensive in time, resources and money and should be unnecessary. There have been lawsuits in ten states and some are ongoing. One of the latest is against the government for failure to verify eligibility:
LAWSUIT AGAINST OBAMA, CONGRESS, SENATE, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, NANCY PELOSI, AND DICK CHENEY, ETC. for failing to verify eligibility. KERCHNER et al v. OBAMA et al filed January 20, 2009 http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-njdce/case_no-1:2009cv00253/case_id-224065/
Barack Obama II knew he could not pass an eligibility investigation: He rejected using public funding when he told the voters and his fellow candidates, John McCain and others, he would limit himself to public funding. He found FEC must verify candidate's eligibility to participate in public funding.
"In the Berg v Obama lawsuit, the FEC has responded to the suit, asking to be removed from the suit as it is not the responsibility of the FEC to verify a candidates eligibility. THE FEC only verifies a candidates eligibility to participate in public funding, which, Obama is not participating in. So, we now have the FEC washing their hands of verification, as well as the FBI washing their hands.
"President Barack Hussein Obama II, and those who promoted him and received appointments knowing he was hiding his identity and might not be eligible for the office of president are guilty of deceiving the voters and government of the United States of America and should be removed from office and impeached.
It is further suggested that the government formed by Barack Hussein Obama II be dissolved in its entirety; that any changes or agreements made during his presidency be abandoned and/or otherwise removed from the record, and the former personnel be brought back as a caretaker government, if willing, and an immediate election take place for a replacement. The mental and physical security of the United States requires that someone familiar with the government and recent happenings would be leading our nation so foreign and domestic problem-makers will not take advantage of us at this important and crucial time; and that leaders of other governments would know the government is in capable hands and the people of the United States would know our government has not been handed to agents or people connected with the Barack Hussein Obama II political machine.
oOPS, George Soros is going to have a problem buying this out - while obama is trying to destroy America - bum-rushing his outrageous policies - through Congress; the lunatics in congress like pelosi, reid and feinsein - can go down the drain - along with obama - his unconstitutional CZAR PALOOZA - of twisted pedophiles - as a Perfect Cleansing. So much for the political strategies of David Axelrod - Mr Rent-a-Mob.
The people of Honduras will be very proud of "we the people".
If obama is forced out of office - Israel will have the back-up that it needs - and should have from the United States of America.

And obama can take his grisly wife back with him to Kenya - and do some basket-weaving - or teach seminars in prison.
GOD BLESS AMERICA!

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

finabiscotti — Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:04:54 GMT

Unholy Alliance: How China and Iran Threaten Peace and Prosperity

October 14, 2009 by John Myers

—Plus: Your Lucky Charm When it Comes to New Wealth"/>

“The nuclear playing card… would allow Iran to fill a power vacuum in the region and fuel the fires of Islamist movements presently gaining steam in the Arab world.”
The Jerusalem Post Op Ed Page, September 29, 2009.

Oct. 1 marked the 60th anniversary of communist rule in mainland China.

Just four days before the Red Anniversary, China National Petroleum Corp. signed a contract with National Iranian Oil Co. to develop Iran’s massive South Azadegan oilfield.

Azadegan is the world’s largest oilfield discovered in the past 30 years. It has reserves of 42 billion barrels of oil—double the combined oil reserves in all of the United States.

China now owns 70 percent of this elephant oilfield. All that oil in the heart of Iran will go a long way to satisfying China’s unquenchable thirst for petroleum.

Already Iran provides 14 percent of China’s oil demand, but that total will rise sharply as this unholy alliance strengthens.

“China is looking for a landline connection to the Persian Gulf or endeavoring to create a ‘string of pearls’ chain of naval facilities between itself and the Strait of Hormuz,” warns Thomas P. M. Barnett in his just published book, Great Powers, America and the World After Bush.

By 2030 China will be buying 6 million barrels of oil per day from the Persian Gulf. That is twice what the United States is expected to import from the region. A vast amount of China’s Middle Eastern oil will come from Iran.

It is worth noting that just days before the Iran oil buyout, China announced that it will not support increased sanctions on Iran as a way to curb its nuclear program. Surprise, surprise.

In fact the Obama administration has been left begging for Beijing’s diplomatic support on Iran’s nuclear ambitions. Without it, the United States faces the unpleasant task of fighting another Middle East war. But Iran won’t be the push-over that Iraq was.

“Armed with a vast array of anti-ship and long-range missiles, Iran can target U.S. troop positions throughout the Middle East and strike U.S. Navy ships,” wrote Jephraim P. Gundzik in a 2005 Asia Times article.

“Iran can also use its weapons to blockade the Straits of Hormuz through which one-third of the world’s traded oil is shipped. With the help of Beijing and Moscow, Tehran is becoming an increasingly unappealing military target for the U.S.,” concluded Gundzik.

Unappealing? Yes. Unavoidable? Probably not.

Even the Obama administration understands nuke-toting mullahs in Iran will jeopardize peace in the Middle East and America’s economic security.

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

American Patriot — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 02:22:40 GMT

Fina

won't let you post bottom Fina that's because it is spam Your are being censoredby yedda

Just a little information to share.
obama might be on the side of Kenya
(hat tip Vs)
Read this article written in 2004; The Kenyans think he was born there.
http://web.archive.org/web/20040627142700/eastandard.net/headlines/news26060403.htm
Sunday, June 27, 2004
Kenyan-born Obama all set for US Senate
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kenyan-born US Senate hopeful, Barrack Obama, appeared set to take over the Illinois Senate seat after his main rival, Jack Ryan, dropped out of the race on Friday night amid a furor over lurid sex club allegations.

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

Kid — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 02:43:06 GMT

Barack Obama Born in Kenya?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yl1K94ALlTA&NR=1

Barack Obama - Born in Kenya II

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-4FqVRWgrNw

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

finabiscotti — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 01:34:10 GMT

Obama Cuts Pro-Democracy Funds for Iran
Wednesday, October 14, 2009 7:34 PM

By: Kenneth R. Timmerman

The Obama administration has cut funding for pro-democracy and human rights programs in Iran, reversing years of efforts during the Bush administration to help develop a civil society, congressional sources told Newsmax this week.

The move is apparently intended to please Iran’s rulers after they criticized President Obama and the State Department for allegedly seeking to fund a “velvet revolution” during the June presidential elections in Iran.

“It sounds like the Iranians complained in Geneva and we acceded to their demands,” a former senior government official familiar with the pro-democracy programs told Newsmax.

“It’s shameful,” he added. “This sends a clear message to Tehran that we are empowering the Iranian regime to be obstinate and fight us."

Word that the administration was planning to cut the pro-democracy programs leaked out in June, when the draft budget for the State Department sent to Congress zeroed out the funds.

The aid cut-back became public last week, when the executive director of the Iran Human Rights Documentation Center, which is affiliated with Yale University campus in New Haven, Conn., disclosed that her center’s request for a grant of $2.7 million had been denied.

“If there is one time that I expected to get funding, this was it,’’ Renee Redman told the Boston Globe last week. “I was surprised, because the world was watching human rights violations right there on television.”

Redman’s center has received $3 million under the State Department program, and has issued reports on human rights abuses. However, they were not active inside Iran and had no programs to support the pro-democracy movement itself, as such activities were considered “too provocative” by the State Department even under President George W. Bush.

Sen. Joseph Lieberman, who co-sponsored legislation earlier this year that greatly expands pro-democracy funding, questioned the wisdom of the Obama administration’s policy shift.

“It is disturbing that the State Department would cut off funding at precisely the moment when these brave investigations are needed most,” he said last week.

Lieberman’s bill, called the Victims of Iranian Censorship (VOICE) act, passed the Senate in July and has been incorporated into the annual defense appropriations bill, which is scheduled for a final vote this week.

The legislation expands funding for Farsi-language broadcasts by the Voice of America and Radio Farda and authorizes the State Department to spend up to $20 million to develop new technologies to help Iranians get around Internet censorship, and another $5 million for human rights documentation.

Congress continues to fund the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), which last year handed out $450,000 to three Iranian-American organizations for media and Internet-related projects. But compared to the $75 million fund set up by former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice — now frozen by the Obama administration — the NED money is just a drop in the bucket.

“The State Department cut in pro-democracy funding for Iran is part and parcel of a very deliberate policy by President Obama to diminish the role of human rights and democracy as goals of U.S. foreign policy,” said Joshua Muravchik, a scholar focusing on democracy promotion with the School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins University.

“This is taking us back to a Nixonian approach to foreign policy, with the incompetence of Carter and the national self-effacement of George McGovern,” he told Newsmax.

President Nixon set aside democracy and human rights to deal with dictatorships such as Communist China and Soviet Russia, based on U.S. national interests. “The Obama administration has combined realism with policies that put the national interest quite low” on the scale of priorities, Muravchik said.

The Iran democracy programs have been shrouded in secrecy, even though they are not classified. David Denehy, a former program manager at the State Department, said he had agreed not to disclose specific grantees or projects, to protect participants who were working inside Iran.

“We did good things with Internet freedom, civil society organizations, and in helping to better inform the Iranian people and better connect them to the outside world,” he told Newsmax. “I don’t see why President Obama wouldn’t support these things. The United States philosophically should always stand on the side of freedom against tyranny.”

The Iranian regime has accused the United States of backing presidential candidate Mir Hossein Moussavi before and after the disputed June 12 presidential elections.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton unexpectedly poured fuel onto those suspicions. In an Aug. 9 interview with CNN’s Fareed Zakaria, she said that the Obama administration was torn between their desire to engage the regime and their sympathy for the protesters.

"And we knew that, if we stepped in too soon, too hard, the attention might very well shift and the leadership would try to use us to unify the country against the protesters. And that was — it was a hard judgment call. But I think we, in retrospect, handled it pretty well.

“Now, behind the scenes, we were doing a lot, as you know,” Clinton added, citing specifically the actions of a young State Department employee, Jared Cohen, who intervened with the management of Twitter to prevent them from shutting down access to Iranian bloggers for technical maintenance.

Iranians close to the protesters have argued that the Obama administration turned its back on them when they most needed moral support from Washington.






The Obama Administration has cut funding for pro-democracy and human rights program in IRAN - reversing years of efforts by the Bush Administration to develop a civil society, congressional sources told Newsmax this week.

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

dfrogpong — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 02:21:50 GMT

lose r

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

dfrogpong — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 03:04:19 GMT

unamerican patriot aka dawg aka the judge aka whizzing aka numerous other accounts is mentally ill. that is why it can either not get a job or hold on to one. it takes hours to post the hundreds of articles this loser posts every day. it also takes hours to give itself helpful answers. the only accomplishment this loser has ever achieved is self reward. this is a typical uneducated far right social conservative that follows the racial, bigot, lying, hate spreading idiot the drug addict limbaugh. the most hated man in the country. glenn beck is a close second.

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

dfrogpong — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 03:05:15 GMT

loser

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

dfrogpong — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 03:32:38 GMT

loser

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

dfrogpong — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 14:07:29 GMT

loser

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

dfrogpong — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 14:08:07 GMT

loser

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

dfrogpong — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 14:09:42 GMT

loser

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

dfrogpong — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:37:22 GMT

loser

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

dfrogpong — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:29:13 GMT

loser

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

Sweet Gypsey — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:35:36 GMT

"This was Sent in by One of Our Best Posters"

Good Morning,

   I opened this email Sunday afternoon and forwarded to several people. No big deal. However, as I was saying goodbye to my little Granddaughter last night, (We are heading to Florida for several weeks), and as I looked at that little face the contents of this Email came back to me. I will let you be the judge, but it just reconfirms my belief that we need to stand united against this attack on our country. If not for us, for our children, and our children's children.

B.

Unite behind Obama?

On Dr. Charles Stanley's Sunday program "In Touch", the guest speaker Dr. David Barton - on Obama:

Respect the Office? Yes.
Respect the Man in the Office? No, I am sorry to say.

I have noted that many elected officials, both Democrats and Republicans, called upon America to unite behind Obama.
Well, I want to make it clear to all who will listen that I AM NOT uniting behind Obama! I will respect the Office which he holds, and I will acknowledge his abilities as an orator and wordsmith and pray for him, BUT that is it.

I have begun today to see what I can do to make sure that he is a one-term President!

Why am I doing this? It is because:

- I do not share Obama's vision or value system for America;

- I do not share his Abortion beliefs;

- I do not share his radical Marxist's concept of re-distributing wealth;

- I do not share his stated views on raising taxes on those who make $150,000+ (the ceiling has been changed three times since August);

- I do not share his view that America is Arrogant;

- I do not share his view that America is not a Christian Nation;

- I do not share his view that the military should be reduced by 25%;

- I do not share his view of amnesty and giving more to illegals than our American Citizens who need help;

- I do not share his views on homosexuality and his definition of marriage;

- I do not share his views that Radical Islam is our friend
and Israel is our enemy who should give up any land;

- I do not share his spiritual beliefs (at least the ones he has made public);

- I do not share his beliefs on how to re-work the healthcare system
in America ;

- I do not share his Strategic views of the Middle East ; and

- I certainly do not share his plan to sit down with terrorist regimes such as Iran .

Bottom line: my America is vastly different from Obama's, and I have a higher obligation to my Country and my GOD to do what is Right!

For eight (8) years, the Liberals in our Society, led by numerous entertainers who would have no platform and no real credibility but for their celebrity status, have attacked President Bush, his family, and his spiritual beliefs! They have not moved toward the center in their beliefs and their philosophies, and they never came together nor compromised their personal beliefs for the betterment of our Country!

They have portrayed my America as a land where everything is tolerated except being intolerant!

They have been a vocal and irreverent minority for years!

They have mocked and attacked the very core values so important to the founding and growth of our Country!

They have made every effort to remove the name of GOD or Jesus Christ from our Society!

They have challenged capital punishment, the right to bear firearms, and the most basic principles of our criminal code!

They have attacked one of the most fundamental of all Freedoms,
the right of free speech!

Unite behind Obama?        Never ! ! !

I am sure many of you who read this think that I am going overboard, but I refuse to retreat one more inch in favor of those whom I believe are the embodiment of Evil!

PRESIDENT BUSH made many mistakes during his Presidency, and I am not sure how history will judge him. However, I believe that he weighed his decisions in light of the long established Judeo-Christian principles of our Founding Fathers!!!

Majority rules in America, and I will honor the concept; however, I will fight with all of my power to be a voice in opposition to Obama and his "goals for America."   I am going to be a thorn in the side of those who, if left unchecked, will destroy our Country ! !

Any more compromise is more defeat!

I pray that the results of this election will wake up many who have sat on the sidelines and allowed the Socialist-Marxist anti-GOD crowd to slowly change so much of what has been good in America!

"Error of Opinion may be tolerated where Reason is left free to combat it." - Thomas Jefferson

GOD bless you and GOD bless our Country ! ! !

Thanks for your time, be safe. "In GOD We Trust"

"If we ever forget that we're one nation under GOD, then we will be a nation gone under." - Ronald Reagan

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

Sweet Gypsey — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:37:26 GMT

"Was sent in as an E-Mail by One of Our Best Posters"
   I had tears as I read it, we have lost so many

Good Morning,

As usual this morning was typical. Coffee and the remote. The quote I am about to describe really pissed me off. On the Morning Joe show they were having the obligatory roundtable. The conversation was about executive pay. Yadda Yadda Yadda. No front page news there.
The comment that really got me, was when the older balding fellow that is a mainstay on the show who's first name is Mike made an offhand comment. Sorry, but I forgot his last name. He said the following, and this is paraphrased. "Of all the things that are going on today, guess what they are having in Washington today? The Iraqi Business Conference!" He went on to make the statement that this event came at a tremendous price of many dollars and 4500 lives.

I'm sorry, but screw you. How about the fact that the Iraqis are having a business conference versus being maimed and tortured by Sadam Hussan. The fact that the elevation of Iraq from third world status to a viable functioning democracy. A democracy that is able to send their representatives to Washington. Forget the fact that Barak Obama and Company have spent in seven months our children's future, and are now working on our Great Great Grandchildren's legacy through lies and deceit in the name of reform. Forget the fact that the price tag of Iraq is a mere pittance to the money they want to spend in the name of Healthcare and Energy reform. Not to mention what they have spent to date.

   Heaven forbid if he could have mentioned the fact that the 4500 brave men and women of the armed service DID fulfill their dream of helping to create a free state in the mist of a totalitarian world. That because of their sacrifice the Iraqis can now send men and women to Washington for such an event. No, No No!!! That's not part of the agenda. How about a simple "THANKS" to our troops for their sacrifice. How about we achieved the goal, and the juice was worth the squeeze.

   I will take it one step further. If ONE soldier dies in Afghanistan today, his or her death should be placed at the foot of Obama. When our President puts a political agenda in front of the lives or our armed forces he should be held accountable for his actions, or lack of. The latter I think.

   Maybe we should pull out of this fight? Maybe we should allow the Taliban to regain control of the area? Maybe when we do get HIT again by these radicals we will once again regain our sense of purpose? The purpose that we once had in the days preceding 911? How soon we forget .Please don't get me wrong when I say the above. I hope it never happens. However, with the mentality that is rampant among the leftist elites, I honestly think that it takes the aftermath of a tragic event to help regain our insights of purpose. That an event of magnitude would serve to wake up our great Country to elect a President that could act decisively and get the JOB done!!! That an event would serve as a reminder that the world is not a kind place, and that we are a target of evil. That an event would serve as a vehicle to send the politically correct cowards back into the holes from which they have emerged.

Will history repeat itself. Carter, Obama then ???.

God Bless our Troops.

B.

God Bless America

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

Sweet Gypsey — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:47:58 GMT

    "The First E-Mail That I Always Go To"
"My Eyes Are Still in Tears, I Don't Show my Emotions"


Good Morning Friends, As most of you know, We have a small Kettle Corn business. We have a lot of shows lined up this winter in southern Florida. This little endeavor is not being done for the love of big money. It is a lot of hard work, and has all of the pitfalls and challenges of any business. We have now done four events and our little company has proved to us to be very rewarding, not in a monetary sense, but in ways that money can't buy.

This weekend we were doing a show in Lake City Florida. Most people call them events, but we call them shows. Why? Because we entertain. We interact with the audience, we create a set, and we really do put on a show. Quite frankly this is right up my alley, and I feel very comfortable in this element. In other words I get to act, to say, and to be, whatever the scene requires without fear of reprimand for being crazy. As D. told my son, "Bring on the Show Pony, and let him sell." Gotta love it.

Something happened this weekend that kinda brought everything full circle

The atmosphere was very festive. Kids and parents alike were dressed in costumes of all descriptions. My favorite was Mr. Pumpkin Head, and his wife Wonder Woman. Anyone who will put a REAL pumpkin on his head and walk around for hours in 85 degree heat, has my vote. When they stopped by our booth to buy a bag of Kettle Corn she was a classic. She looked at Donna and said, " I could have married Brad Pitt, but look what I got. Mr. Stupid Pumpkin Head!" Mr. Pumpkin Head didn't say a word, just bobbed his stupid Pumpkin Head up and down. The guy had my respect.

Later on I noticed in the crowd a young lady, and who I assumed was her sister, walking through the event. The one girl was afflicted with Downs Syndrome. I latter found out the afflicted girls name was Chris. It seemed obvious that she was in utter amazement over the costumes, the band, and the festive atmosphere. She too, loved Mr. Pumpkin Head, and I could see her pointing and laughing at his outfit. It was obvious that she was having a great day. What was also obvious was that her sister was not. I can only imagine how hard it is to care for the special needs of Chris. My hat is off to her.

Chris and her sister eventually stopped by "Kernel B's" to buy a bag of Kettle Corn. D. had gone to lunch and left me to watch the stand. I am sorry she was not there.

   The sister asked me how much for a bag. I told her, and she proceeded to dig into her purse for her money. When she paid, I gave her a bag and a smile, and told her thanks. It was at this point something awesome happened.

   Chris grabbed for the bag and was immediately rebuked by her Sister. I could see the look of disappointment on her face. I motioned for her to come to me. I gave her a bag of Corn for herself. As she clutched the bag a look came over her face. I will never forget that look. Never!

   She proceeded to put the bag down and grabbed my hand.

She looked me in the eye and in" SIGN", while mouthing the words said, " I LOVE   YOU."

All I can say is that the Show Pony cried, and is crying as he is writing this now.

I will simply let you be the judge of what I learned on Saturday.

A simple hint,"It aint about the money."

B.

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

Nanadee — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 22:57:15 GMT

HI SWEET GYPSY About Nanadee THIS IS O MY PROFILE...

Look at life like a happy time. Keep smiling. Give kids and seniors a smile and how are you today.I give respect to others andi love yedda. Its like visiting pepole without leaving hom
this is why i said what i did on my profile. you are so right with your answer, sweet gypsy, it gives a warm feeling in your heart. CHILDREN ASND SENIORS ALWAYS DO BECAUSE IT TAKES VERY LITTLE TO MAKE THEM HAPPY AND YOU GET RETURNED WITH LOVE AND HAPPINESS. i use to have these muppets like on sesemee street and i dressed them up and i had a screen made with pvc pipe that was very light and put a tableclothe over it and play some cute singing tapes on it and go to where little chidren were and put on a show to see there eyes lite up. it was awesome and somtimes i would dress up in my clown outfit. i also went to nursing homes. at christmas i would dress my muppets like mr. and mrs, santa clause with cotton balls for hair and beard. everyone loved with christamas sing a long. i also had christian songs some times. everyone enjoyed that in church and nursing homes. i am not able to do it now but i still have the awesome and loving memories to remember. i think God would say to me, well done, nothing better than seeing the joy and eyes lit up over somethig very simple to do for children and seniors because they are both child like in God;s eyes. amen.
thanks sweet gypsy for your post, i really enjoyed it
God bless
nanadee

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

Sweet Gypsey — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:55:56 GMT

"TO MY Marco and Nic and other Patriots, Thank you"

Subject: FW: Is this an uprising coming!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Not mincing words as he sees it !!!!

"The Axis of Idiots"
From the Podium:
J. D. Pendry, Retired Sergeant Major, USMC

FROM THE PODIUM
This retired USMC Sgt. Major has his Stuff together.

Jimmy Carter, you are the father of the Islamic Nazi movement. You threw the Shah under the bus, welcomed the Ayatollah home, and then lacked the spine to confront the terrorists when they took our embassy and our people hostage. You're the "runner-in-chief."

Bill Clinton, you played ring around the Lewinsky while the terrorists were at war with us. You got us into a fight with them in Somalia and then you ran from it. Your weak-willed responses to the USS Cole and the First Trade Center Bombing and Our Embassy Bombings emboldened the killers. Each time you failed to respond adequately, they grew bolder, until 9/11/2001.

John Kerry, dishonesty is your most prominent attribute. You lied about American Soldiers in Vietnam. Your military service, like your life, is more
fiction than fact. You've accused our military of terrorizing women and children in Iraq. You called Iraq the wrong war, wrong place, wrong time, and the same words you used to describe Vietnam.. You're a fake! You want to run from Iraq and abandon the Iraqis to murderers just as you did to the Vietnamese.. Iraq, like Vietnam, is another war that you were for, before you were against it.

John Murtha, you said our military was broken.. You said we can't win militarily in Iraq. You accused United States Marines of cold-blooded murder without proof and said we should redeploy to Okinawa. Okinawa, John? And the Democrats call you their military expert! Are you sure you didn't suffer a traumatic brain injury while you were off building your war hero resume? You're a sad, pitiable, corrupt, and washed up old fool. You're not a Marine, sir. You wouldn't amount to a good pimple on a real Marine's ass. You're a phony and a disgrace. Run away, John.

Dick Durbin, you accused our Soldiers at Guantanamo of being Nazis, tenders of Soviet style gulags and as bad as the regime of Pol Pot, who murdered two million of his own people after your party abandoned Southeast Asia to the Communists. Now you want to abandon the Iraqis to the same fate. History was not a good teacher for you, was it? Lord help us! See Dick run.

Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Carl Levine, Barbara Boxer, Diane Feinstein, Russ Feingold, Pat Leahy, Barack Obama, Chuck Schumer, the Hollywood Leftist morons, et al, ad nauseam: Every time you stand in front of television cameras and broadcast to the Islamic Nazis that we went to war because our President lied, that the war is wrong and our Soldiers are torturers, that we should leave Iraq, you give the Islamic butchers - the same ones that tortured and mutilated American Soldiers - cause to think that we'll run away again, and all they have to do is hang on a little longer. It is inevitable that we, the infidels, will have to defeat the Islamic jihadists. Better to do it now on their turf, than later on ours after they have gained both strength and momentum.

American news media, the New York Times particularly: Each time you publish stories about national defense secrets and our intelligence gathering methods, you become one united with the sub-human pieces of camel dung that torture and mutilate the bodies of American Soldiers. You can't strike up the courage to publish cartoons, but you can help Al Qaeda destroy my country. Actually, you are more dangerous to us than Al Qaeda is. Think about that each time you face Mecca to admire your Pulitzer..

You are America's 'AXIS OF IDIOTS.' Your Collective Stupidity will destroy us. Self-serving politics and terrorist-abetting news scoops are more important to you than our national security or the lives of innocent civilians and Soldiers. It bothers you that defending ourselves gets in the way of your elitist sport of politics and your ignorant editorializing. There is as much blood on your hands as is on the hands of murdering terrorists. Don't ever doubt that. Your frolics will only serve to extend this war as they extended Vietnam. If you want our Soldiers home as you claim, knock off the crap and try supporting your country ahead of supporting your silly political aims and aiding our enemies.

Yes, I'm questioning your patriotism. Your loyalty ends with self. I'm also questioning why you're stealing air that decent Americans could be breathing. You don't deserve the protection of our men and women in uniform. You need to run away from this war, this country. Leave the war to the people who have the will to see it through and the country to people who are willing to defend it.

Our country has two enemies: Those who want to destroy us from the outside and those who attempt it from within.

Semper Fi,
J. D. Pendry - Sergeant Major, USMC, Retired

This is a savvy man. He has nailed it down pretty good. Too bad it won't do any good. There won't be 1 in 10 that receive it who will forward it.

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

finabiscotti — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:13:56 GMT

Excuse me - Richard - this is necessary - because Obama breeds the bliss of ignorance:
(hat tip l)
Are you one of those people who are
Too dumb to take the hard tests -
Too dumb to take the hard classes -
Too dumb to get a job based on skill -
Too dumb to compete on a level playing field -
Too dumb to gain on your merit -
Too dumb to read a contract -
Too dumb to parent your own children -
Too dumb to succeed in the land of opportunity -
Too dumb to feed yourself -
Too dumb to get your own credit line -
Too dumb to pay your own bills -
Too dumb to take care of your health needs -
Do you have so little talent - intelligence - desire - respect for yourself - that you have to beg your MASTER DADDY government to take care of all your needs -
How pathetic -
You aren't FREE - you are society's generational leaches - content with your leaders dribble of hating the wealthy and capitalism - while they get rich capitalizing off of your stupidity - and you mindlessly high five yourselves - thinking you have really accompolished something by hoping for the scraps they promise you -
Al Gore is right - your children are smarter than you - and with the educational system today - that's not saying much

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

canyoutakeajoke — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:30:39 GMT

Toilet Mug

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

finabiscotti — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 10:02:57 GMT

Is a clue to what side Obama is on:

(hat tip Aa)

If this doesn't get your attention as to what your "president" is all about, nothing will: http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=tCAffMSWSzY#t=28

BURN THIS VIDEO ON A CD.
------------------------------------

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

American Patriot — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 18:06:21 GMT

thanks fina for this video

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

honey — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 00:12:48 GMT

American Patriot

Another thought provoking question! My opinion is based on what we already know about President Obama and his administration. If H1N1 has been declared as a national emergency, Binyamin Netanyahu must wonder what will happen next!

1. Will the Israelis bomb Iran? All factors considered, it becomes a possibility because President Obama has failed to honor his commitment to Israel.

2. Who's side will Obama be on? Simple answer? Obama will continue to be on his OWN side.

3. Who's side will American's be on? In my opinion this will be a 'tossup!'

With the recent events at Ft. Hood, Texas, we need to understand the American Military's opinion. An American born medical officer who is a board certified psychiatrist, chose to murder unarmed soldiers. This was premeditated murder. During his internship and later he required supervision and counseling. There were enough red flags in his military profile to have warranted a more thorough evaluation of his mental status. A Muslim, by faith, serving in the United States Army, there were no identifiable occasions of prejudicial treatment. His speciality in PTSS warrants even more consideration, as does listing Palestinian at the Mosque he attended while stationed at Walter Reed Army Medical Center.

As an Army Brat, I offer my condolences to all involved and that includes his own family.

hs

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

finabiscotti — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 06:39:08 GMT

Richard - this is required reading - because of Islamic ideology and Palestinian ARAB background:

(hat tip V)

BLAMING THE TARGETS
IBID, CANADA
Islamic ideology and Palestinian Arab background

Completely ignoring his Islamic ideology and Palestinian Arab background, the media speculated that he might have been suffering from Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, even though he had never served in a combat zone, that he was angry over being deployed to Iraq, even though he had a history of pro-terrorist postings predating that, and finally that he had been bullied by other soldiers for being a Muslim, a claim that has since emerged as completely baseless.
All of these however were ways of shifting the blame from Nidal Hassan and his Islamist ideology, and onto his victims, the men and women he had tried to kill, and the United States Army itself.
Once again the media apparatchiks had decided that blame for a Muslim killing spree rested not with the perpetrator, but with his targets

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

Sweet Gypsey — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:03:01 GMT

"Today This is What he Slipped into My E-Mail"
     "Know it is A Hard Day for A lot of Us"
Subject: Debt Power and Inflation

Robert,

Let me say thanks for all that you are doing at GETLIBERTY.ORG. I have been following your progress for months now, and it is stellar to say the least. However, there is one very important component that I think you need to add to your ever growing list. I am the first to admit that I know enough about politics and monetary policy to be dangerous. However, there are certain actions that I think even an idiot like me can see, yet have no explanation for. I take that back, the explanation is as plain as the nose on my face, and once explored goes back to the dawn of modern times. Trade, greed, and mans universal want of material things. It all boils down to MONEY!
No, this is not a liberal tirade against the sins of the free market. Just the opposite, as I believe that the free market is what will get us out of the current financial crisis. That is, if it is allowed to. Herein lies the problem. IF IT IS ALLOWED TO??

I know, what the hell am I talking about?

I am talking about the actions of our large financial institutions, and their current policies in the name of profits.

The actions that include receiving huge chunks of capital in the name of Stimulus, TARP, Economic Recovery Act, or whatever else the various governmental agencies can give a name too, then proceed to advance funds in the name of. Instead of loaning these funds back to the citizens, small business's, or farmers that gave them the funds via taxes/government, have taken the money's and invested in commodities and various stock markets around the world. Thus screwing the people. Again.
.
My god what is wrong with this picture?

The Americans who have diligently paid their taxes, to have their hard earned dollars routed to the banks, who then refuse to make loans to these same people with their OWN money!

You see Robert, I was asking myself some very basic questions this weekend. Questions that didn't make sense.
How is it that Gold and Oil are rising, when the dollar is falling off a cliff. That the stock market is rising, yet jobs are being lost in record numbers. Finally, a national debt that is heading us into oblivion, not to mention a manufacturing base that has stalled to say the least. (Which I believe is contrary to what Joe Biden is saying)

The answer should have been clear to me, but I didn't pick up on it until I heard an economist state the obvious.
The banks are simply creating yet another financial bubble in the stock market by diverting OUR funds from us to other more lucrative avenues. My guess is they will not only make huge sums on the rise of the market, but also massive amounts on the fall. Selling short is still legal right??

In short, no pun intended, it is this new "ARTIFICIAL BUBBLE", that we need to bring into our discussions, along with all of the rest. We all know, or should know, that massive inflation is the Feds answer to our crippling debt. It is right around the corner. My kids will soon understand this new horror. The horror of inflation and all that it implies. Also, when this next bubble burst we need to ask ourselves several simple questions, "What is Americas landscape going to look like?" How bad is this potential? More importantly, what is the long term plan of those who are operating and directing these actions? Finally, how do we combat it? We know that the cause and effect is in the name of profit, or at least it use to be. Or, should we be asking this last question, "Is it possible that the cause and effect could be in the name of power and domination for the demise of all that we hold sacred?" It is possible you know. America is not infallible. No country is.

I guess the bottom line is this. As we are fighting what I maintain is "ALL OF THE ABOVE", this situation needs to be thrust into the mix. This final straw, in my opinion, has the potential to break all of our backs, or at a minimum, crack a few vertebrae. Let me state for the record, "I don't want to see the surgeon!"

Once again, thanks for all that you are doing, and hopefully this message has given you something else to think about. I think if we examine where we are, we may come to this conclusion. We are where we are simply as a result of the same power brokers performing various actions with the means to their own ends. That they are doing it over and over by using different actions, but achieving the same results. If we are going to get back to free markets, I think that we need to free the market?

Keep the faith my friend, we are going to need it if this levy breaks.

B.

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

Sweet Gypsey — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:05:13 GMT

"PLEASE VIEW NOW, VERY IMPORTANT"
           "THANK YOU"

http://www.floridasecuritycouncil.org/events.html

Dear Friends,

This will be very short and to the point.

I have not read Sal Salinskys Rules For Radicals. At this point in Obama's tenure, I don't think it is necessary. Why? Because we can watch the Obama's Rules For Radicals in real time.

When it was announced this morning that four of the Gitmo terrorist are going to be shipped to New York for trial it doesn't take a high paid political stradegist to look at the reasoning behind this action.

Simply put, this is yet another attempt at "Smoke and Mirrors" by the Obama administration. Another attempt to take our eyes off of the ball. I should say BALLS, as their are so many in the air it does get confusing. The Press will fall for this tactic yet again. In fact they already have.

In my opinion this action is out and out dangerous! Dangerous on many different levels.

We have a president who is a Muslim sympathizer. Lets just say it. When you look at his roots, his upbringing, his history, it all stands to reason. This is who he is. However, it is NOT who the American people are. We simply need to look at his actions to justify the statement. Do we not?

The link I have posted at the top of the page is CRITICAL to watch. If you do not do anything today, please take Eleven minutes and watch the FITNA clip by Gerrt Wilders. This man will enlighten you to the pitfalls of the road that we are heading down. As he points out the Dutch, and much of Europe have already traveled this route, and are now REGRETTING ever having ever set foot on this road. We DO NOT need to make these same mistakes! I have seen Mr. Wilders speak in person, and can tell you from the bottom of my heart, he knows the score, and is trying with all of his being to help guide us from a path best NOT taken. America needs to listen.

I promise you one thing. If you take the time to click on the link, you will understand. Understanding is key to what I now consider Americas victory.

One last statement as I am thoroughly pissed now!!

Once again, this man, our Commander in Chief, is playing with political dynamite in order to pursue his agenda. His ideology. An agenda that the majority of Americans do not want. An ideology the will destroy, if allowed, the core of our sovereignty. Our freedoms, our religions, and our way of life.

All in the name of FUNDAMENTAL CHANGE. Right!

Wrong. This is now a FUNDAMENTAL WAR!

If the son of bitches walk free in the name of political correctness we should demand that Obama be impeached.
If New York City is once again attacked as a result of these actions we should demand that HE face trial for these actions.
If this veiled attempt at taking OUR eyes off the ball for political reasons results in the death of one American, HE and anyone who has helped to precipitate these actions, should be held accountable.

In the name of Political INCORRECTNESS, "Don't you dare put me, my family, my friends, or my country in the cross hairs of your agenda."

Please watch the clip.

B.

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

finabiscotti — Sun, 15 Nov 2009 14:20:39 GMT

Richard, I am on the road - and wanted to hit in some stuff.   Did not have time to separate it - but it is good information on what is going on in IRAN - and other stuff. I thought that you would enjoy this picture - Free Nobel Peace Prize......

Shot of the Day

• Email to a friend • Article Search • •

Muslim in America: 9/11 Sign posted in the window of a Muslim store in TEXAS

H/T Bare Naked Islam

Ali, in full, Ali ibn Abu Talib (c. 600 – 661), the fourth of the caliphs or successors of Muhammad, was born at Mecca about the year A.D. 600. His father, Abu Talib, was an uncle of the Prophet, and Ali himself was adopted by Muhammad and educated under his care.
The question of Ali’s right to succeed to the caliphate is an article of faith which divided the Muslim world into two great sects, the Sunni and the Shia. The Sunnis believe that the prophet chose Abu Bakr to be the first caliph, while the Shia believe that he chose Ali and announced it in public in Ghadir Khom. Whatever the case, Ali did not challenge Abu Bakr or any of the later caliphs, rather he served as an advisor to them.
Ali is greatly respected by all Muslims, both Sunni and Shia. The Shia, venerate him especially as second only to the prophet, call him the “Lion of God” (Sher-i-Khuda), and celebrate the anniversary of his martyrdom.
Ali was the first to offer his services for Jihad. SHIA.ORG

• Email to a friend • •

Who Owns F**K CAIR?

Like a cornered rat, CAIR is striking at any one, any thing, grasping at libels to attack freedom's warriors ........the latest victim of their jihad: Spencer

Picking up on libels from a Leftist pro-jihad hate site, the Hamas-linked unindicted conspirator the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) has claimed in its "American Muslim News Briefs" email that I own the domains f***allah.com and f***islam.com and have redirected them to Jihad Watch.
"In doing so," says the CAIR News Brief, "Robert Spencer may have been trying to actively market his hate material to like-minded audiences. It is a well known fact that keywords are a crucial factor in the popularity of a blog. This is damning evidence of the true gutter intent behind his little blog project which is to attract and further incite those with Islamophobic tendencies, his primary audience."
In fact, it is damning evidence of CAIR's willingness to pass on outright libels.
For the record, I do not own the domain names f***allah.com and f***islam.com, and have nothing to do with them whatsoever. I have never engaged in such tactics and do not approve of them.
Anyone can buy a domain name and redirect it anywhere he wants. I could buy f***cair.com and redirect it to the CAIR site -- but I won't. This is clearly a smear designed to discredit Jihad Watch and my work, and I'm engaged in active efforts now to find out who does own those sites -- they registered them with Domains By Proxy, indicating that they had something to hide from the beginning. But they will be found out, and I am sure their identity will be interesting in many ways.
My ace tech man has been working all day with enon.com, where those domains originated, and has finally succeeded in getting them to redirect these domain names so they don't bring one to Jihad Watch.
I wrote to CAIR's Ibrahim "Honest Ibe" Hooper awhile ago asking for a retraction and apology. In a typical evasion of responsibility, he wrote back directing me to the Leftist hate site. But that won't make his obvious libel go away.
So who owns F**kCAIR.com? Heh.

• Email to a friend • Article Search • •

Searing Islamic Insight into the Jewish Problem

• Email to a friend • •

Iran Arming Foreign Proxies for War: Iranian Arms Shipment Seized En Route to Islamic Terrorists Hezb'Allah

The UN fails yet again in enforcing any resolution that does not involve punishing Israel. The destruction of Israel is the mission of the UN. Ironic that the UN was created in the wake of the horror and unimaginable barbarity of crimes against humanity, and here we are 60 odd years later and the very people whose annihilation gave the UN life are now the very same people the UN seeks to annihilate. Oh, the humanity.
And what horse does the muhammadan POTUS back in this race?
Iran's Khamenei Rejects U.S. Outreach - Thomas Erdbrink and William Branigin
Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, spurning what he described as several personal overtures from President Obama, warned Tuesday that negotiating with the U.S. would be "naive and perverted" and that Iranian politicians should not be "deceived" into starting such talks. "Whenever they [the U.S.] smile at the officials of the Islamic revolution, when we carefully look at the situation, we notice that they are hiding a dagger behind their back," he said. "They have not changed their intentions." (Washington Post)

Today, yet again:
Iranian Arms Shipment Seized En Route to Terrorist Group Background: The Threat of Iranian Missile Development and Export Photos of Israeli naval force intercepting Iranian weapons ship (Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs)
Photos of Israeli naval force intercepting Iranian weapons ship (Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs)
A cargo ship filled with tons of weaponry en route from Iran to Syria was intercepted Tuesday (Nov. 3) 100 miles (161 km) off of Israel’s coast. The ship, carrying hundreds of tons of advanced weaponry and missiles,[1] including Katyusha rockets, assault rifles, mortar shells, grenades, and anti-aircraft platforms, was to be delivered to the Iran-backed terrorist group Hezbollah.[2]

On the same day, Israeli military intelligence revealed that the Iranian-backed terrorist group Hamas successfully tested a rocket with a range of up to 37 miles (60 km), which places Israel’s second largest city Tel Aviv within firing range.[3] Hamas also possesses other Iranian-manufactured rockets like the Fajr-3, which has a range of up to 29 miles (47 km).[4]
UN Resolutions limiting Iranian Export and Arms Trade

Resolution summary Excerpt from original text UN Security Council Resolution 1737 (December 23rd, 2006)
A UN resolution determining, inter alia, a limit on export of certain Iranian products and items -"Decides that Iran shall not export any of the items in documents S/2006/814 and S/2006/815 and that all Member States shall prohibit the procurement of such items from Iran by their nationals, or using their flag vessels or aircraft, and whether or not originating in the territory of Iran." UN Security Council Resolution 1474 (March 24th, 2007)
Explicitly forbids all export of arms from Iran (not only to terrorist organizations), without relating to methods of enforcement. "Decides that Iran shall not supply, sell or transfer directly or indirectly from its territory or by its nationals or using its flag vessels or aircraft any arms or related material, and that all States shall prohibit the procurement of such items from Iran by their nationals, or using their flag vessels or aircraft, and whether or not originating in the territory of Iran." החלטה 1803 של מועבי"ט (3 מרס 2008) - UN Security Council Resolution 1803 (March 24th, 2008)
Calls for supervision over the movement of aircraft and naval vessels owned by the companies Iran Air and IRISL (Annexes 11 and 12) "Calls upon all States, in accordance with their national legal authorities and legislation and consistent with international law, in particular the law of the sea and relevant international civil aviation agreements, to inspect the cargoes to and from Iran of aircraft and vessels, at their airports and seaports, owned or operated by Iran Air Cargo and Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines, provided there are reasonable grounds to believe that the aircraft or vessel is transporting goods prohibited under this resolution or resolution 1737 (2006) or resolutions 1747 (2007);"

UN Security Council Resolution 1835 September 27th, 2008
Reconfirms earlier resolutions dealing with the issue of Iranian exports and arms trading, and calls on Iran to immediately fulfill its obligations as they appear in prior resolutions. “Reaffirms the statement of its President, S/PRST/2006/15, of 29 March, and its resolution 1696 (2006) of 31 July 2006, its resolution 1737 (2006) of 23 December 2006, its resolution 1747 (2007) of 24 March 2007, and its resolution 1803 (2008) of 3 March 2008…
Calls upon Iran to comply fully and without delay with its obligations under the above-mentioned resolutions of the security council…
Iranian Attempts to Smuggle Arms Have Been Uncovered
A. December 2001 – The Karin A vessel, loaded with weapons in Iran, bound for the Gaza Strip, sailed in the direction of Egypt with the intention of unloading its cargo in Egypt. Small fishing boats were meant to pick up the cargo and deliver it to the Gaza Strip. The ship, loaded with rockets, anti-tank rockets, and light arms, was seized on January 3rd, 2002 by Israeli Naval Commandos.

B. December 2003 – January 2004 - The Iranian Revolutionary Guard directed an aerial convoy to transfer weapons and supplies to Hezbollah via Syria. The aerial convoys were disguised as humanitarian aid intended for those injured in an earthquake in Bam, a city in southern Iran. The Iranians took advantage of the open airspace by trying to smuggle weapons to Hezbollah while humanitarian aid flights were landing in Iran from all over the world.
3. May 2007 – An Iranian train carrying arms (mortar shells, light arms, rocket launchers and ammunition) was uncovered in Turkey. The arms were destined to reach Hezbollah. The Iranians attempted to conceal and disguise the arms in order to avoid suspicion by the Turkish authorities.
4. January 2009-An arms shipment sent by Iran was intercepted and seized in Cyprus after it was found on the Cypriot vessel Monchegorsk which had been leased by the Iranian Irisl shipping company. The Cargo was found to include tank, artillery and mortar shells as well as materials to be used for producing rockets.
5. October 2009-The Hansa India, which sailed from Iran flying a German flag was due to unload a cargo of eight containers in Egypt. Following warnings from the German authorities the vessel was not unloaded and continued to Malta where it was seized and found to be carrying bullets and industrial material intended for the production of weapons, seemingly bound for Syria.
• Email to a friend • •

The Vote on Goldstone: Separating Out the Jew Haters, Saudi Tools, and Jihad lovers

I thought you should see who the Jew haters are in Congress. The vote on the OIC (Organization of the Islamic Conference)-generated Goldstone report -- the white paper on Jewish blood libel -- is very telling. Anyone who voted nay, or present or didn't vote aligned himself or herself with savages. They hate freedom, individual rights, democracy and invariably.... America. They are freedom's enemies.
Muslim Mafia page 195

Top 11 recipients of Arab Muslim cash

Rahall - voted nay
Moran - voted nay
Issa - voted yea
Conyers - did not vote
Kucinich - voted nay
Jackson - voted yea
Lee - voted nay
Dingell - voted nay
Kilpatrick - voted nay
Jackson-Lee - voted yea
McDermott - voted nay

Shows what that money will buy -- 7 nay votes and one did not vote.
I am pleasantly surprised at Issa, Jackson, and Jackson-Lee.

US Congress condemns UN Goldstone Report, 344 to 36; full text & voting breakdown Published by Hillel Neuer

Click here for the final text of House Resolution 867, as adopted today by the U.S. Congress by a vote of 344 to 36, slamming the ignominious Goldstone Report. The roll call is below.

(Democrats in roman; Republicans in italic; Independents underlined)
      H RES 867      2/3 YEA-AND-NAY      3-Nov-2009      5:41 PM
      QUESTION:  On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree, as Amended
      BILL TITLE: Calling on the President and the Secretary of State to oppose unequivocally any endorsement or further consideration of the “Report of the United Nations Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict” in multilateral fora
YEAS NAYS PRES NV DEMOCRATIC 179 33 20 23 REPUBLICAN 165 3 2 7 INDEPENDENT TOTALS 344 36 22 30
—- YEAS    344 — Aderholt
Adler (NJ)
Akin
Alexander
Altmire
Andrews
Arcuri
Austria
Baca
Bachus
Barrow
Bartlett
Barton (TX)
Bean
Berkley
Berman
Berry
Biggert
Bilbray
Bilirakis
Bishop (GA)
Bishop (NY)
Bishop (UT)
Blackburn
Blunt
Boccieri
Boehner
Bonner
Bono Mack
Boozman
Boren
Boswell
Boyd
Brady (TX)
Braley (IA)
Bright
Broun (GA)
Brown (SC)
Brown, Corrine
Brown-Waite, Ginny
Buchanan
Burgess
Burton (IN)
Butterfield
Buyer
Calvert
Camp
Campbell
Cantor
Cao
Capito
Cardoza
Carnahan
Carney
Carter
Cassidy
Castle
Castor (FL)
Chaffetz
Chandler
Childers
Chu
Cleaver
Clyburn
Coble
Coffman (CO)
Cohen
Cole
Conaway
Connolly (VA)
Costa
Costello
Courtney
Crenshaw
Crowley
Cuellar
Culberson
Cummings
Davis (CA)
Davis (IL)
DeGette
DeLauro
Dent
Diaz-Balart, L.
Diaz-Balart, M.
Dicks
Donnelly (IN)
Doyle
Dreier
Driehaus
Edwards (TX)
Ehlers
Ellsworth
Emerson
Engel
Etheridge
Fallin
Fattah
Flake
Fleming
Forbes
Fortenberry
Foster
Foxx
Frank (MA)
Franks (AZ)
Frelinghuysen
Fudge
Gallegly
Garrett (NJ)
Gerlach
Giffords
Gingrey (GA)
Gohmert
Gonzalez Goodlatte
Granger
Graves
Grayson
Green, Al
Green, Gene
Griffith
Guthrie
Hall (TX)
Halvorson
Hare
Harman
Harper
Hastings (FL)
Hastings (WA)
Heller
Hensarling
Herger
Herseth Sandlin
Higgins
Hill
Himes
Hinojosa
Hodes
Hoekstra
Holden
Hoyer
Hunter
Inglis
Inslee
Israel
Issa
Jackson (IL)
Jackson-Lee (TX)
Jenkins
Johnson (IL)
Johnson, Sam
Jordan (OH)
Kagen
Kanjorski
Kennedy
Kildee
Kilroy
Kind
King (IA)
King (NY)
Kingston
Kirk
Kirkpatrick (AZ)
Kissell
Klein (FL)
Kline (MN)
Kosmas
Kratovil
Lamborn
Lance
Langevin
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Latham
LaTourette
Latta
Lee (NY)
Levin
Lewis (CA)
Lewis (GA)
Linder
Lipinski
LoBiondo
Lowey
Lucas
Luetkemeyer
Lummis
Lungren, Daniel E.
Mack
Maffei
Maloney
Manzullo
Marchant
Markey (CO)
Markey (MA)
Marshall
Massa
Matheson
Matsui
McCarthy (CA)
McCarthy (NY)
McCaul
McClintock
McCotter
McHenry
McIntyre
McKeon
McMahon
McMorris Rodgers
McNerney
Meek (FL)
Melancon
Mica
Michaud
Miller (FL)
Miller (MI)
Miller (NC)
Miller, Gary
Minnick
Mitchell
Mollohan
Moore (KS)
Moore (WI)
Moran (KS)
Murphy (CT)
Murphy (NY)
Murphy, Tim
Murtha
Myrick Nadler (NY)
Napolitano
Neal (MA)
Neugebauer
Nye
Oberstar
Olson
Ortiz
Paulsen
Pence
Perlmutter
Perriello
Peters
Peterson
Petri
Pitts
Platts
Poe (TX)
Polis (CO)
Pomeroy
Posey
Putnam
Quigley
Radanovich
Rangel
Rehberg
Reichert
Reyes
Richardson
Rodriguez
Roe (TN)
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rogers (MI)
Rohrabacher
Rooney
Ros-Lehtinen
Roskam
Ross
Rothman (NJ)
Roybal-Allard
Royce
Ruppersberger
Rush
Ryan (OH)
Ryan (WI)
Salazar
Sanchez, Loretta
Sarbanes
Scalise
Schakowsky
Schauer
Schiff
Schmidt
Schock
Schrader
Schwartz
Scott (GA)
Scott (VA)
Sensenbrenner
Serrano
Sessions
Sestak
Shadegg
Shea-Porter
Sherman
Shimkus
Shuler
Shuster
Simpson
Skelton
Slaughter
Smith (NE)
Smith (NJ)
Smith (TX)
Smith (WA)
Space
Spratt
Stearns
Sullivan
Sutton
Tanner
Taylor
Teague
Terry
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Thompson (PA)
Thornberry
Tiahrt
Tiberi
Titus
Tonko
Tsongas
Turner
Upton
Van Hollen
Visclosky
Walden
Walz
Wasserman Schultz
Watson
Waxman
Weiner
Westmoreland
Wexler
Whitfield
Wilson (OH)
Wilson (SC)
Wittman
Wolf
Yarmuth
Young (AK)
Young (FL)

—- NAYS    36 — Baird
Baldwin
Blumenauer
Boustany
Capps
Carson (IN)
Clarke
Clay
Davis (KY)
Dingell
Doggett
Edwards (MD) Ellison
Filner
Grijalva
Hinchey
Johnson, E. B.
Kilpatrick (MI)
Kucinich
Lee (CA)
Lynch
McCollum
McDermott
McGovern Miller, George
Moran (VA)
Olver
Pastor (AZ)
Paul
Price (NC)
Rahall
Snyder
Stark
Waters
Watt
Woolsey

—- ANSWERED “PRESENT”    22 — Becerra
Cooper
Dahlkemper
DeFazio
Delahunt
Duncan
Eshoo
Farr Heinrich
Hirono
Honda
Johnson (GA)
Jones
Kaptur
Loebsack
Lofgren, Zoe Luján
Obey
Speier
Tierney
Welch
Wu

—- NOT VOTING    30 — Abercrombie
Ackerman
Bachmann
Barrett (SC)
Boucher
Brady (PA)
Capuano
Conyers
Davis (AL)
Davis (TN) Deal (GA)
Gordon (TN)
Gutierrez
Hall (NY)
Holt
Meeks (NY)
Murphy, Patrick
Nunes
Pallone
Pascrell Payne
Pingree (ME)
Price (GA)
Sánchez, Linda T.
Sires
Souder
Stupak
Towns
Velázquez
Wamp FINAL VOTE RESULTS FOR ROLL CALL 838

• Email to a friend • Article Search • •

Day 135 Iran Revolution: Violent Protests Against Dictators in Iran on Anniversary of US Hostage Crisis UPDATE: protestors had a direct message for America's president too: "You're Either With Us or With Them"

UPDATE: ABC reports: Iranian protesters took to the streets today as they do every Nov. 4 to mark the 30th anniversary of the U.S. embassy takeover. But this year, opponents of the Iranian regime used the government sanctioned day of street demonstrations to challenge the hard line administration. While supporters of the regime led chants of "death to America," crowds nearby shouted "death to the dictator," a veiled reference to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and his political ally, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. And via this video report, CNN adds the protestors had a direct message for America's president too: "You're Either With Us or With Them" (hat tip Dan)

Watch the last 10 seconds ..............

Death to Dictators.

These people dying for freedom would have half a chance if the President of the US would stop supporting the Islamic slaughterers in power. The worst president at the worst time. Obama wants to enrich their uranium. Got that?
How brave these Iranians are, knowing the penalty and torture for marching for freedom ....

Protests flare in Iran's capital as demonstrators, security forces clash
Large areas of Tehran are in chaos as troops fire tear gas and beat antigovernment protesters on the 30th anniversary of the U.S. Embassy's seizure. Demonstrations erupt in other cities as well.
Reporting from Tehran and Beirut - Large stretches of the Iranian capital erupted in chaos and violence today as antigovernment protesters and security forces clashed on the 30th anniversary of the takeover of the U.S. Embassy by radical students.

Amateur videotape also purported to show small, boisterous demonstrations in the Caspian Sea city of Rasht, the southwestern city of Ahvaz and the eastern city of Mashhad.

For the first time in months, there were also credible reports and video footage of a sizable demonstration on the campus of the main university in the northwestern city of Tabriz, the capital of Iran's ethnic Azeri region and historically a hotbed of political activity.

As dusk settled, protesters in Tehran continued to gather in the streets and prepare for what they predicted would be a long night of clashes with security forces stationed at main squares around the capital.

"I was beaten up by a baton so badly that one policeman begged his colleague to have pity on me and stop beating me," said one protester, a 54-year-old mother of three who asked that her name not be published. "But I am not scared. I will keep protesting until the end."

Today's demonstration did not appear to be as large as the huge marches that erupted after the disputed June 12 reelection of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. But the protest, the largest in six weeks, struck at one of the ideological pillars of the Islamic Republic by showing that a sizable chunk of Iranians disagree with hard-liners' anti-American agenda

Though the demonstration stemmed from the contested election, America's tangled 56-year relationship with Iran took center stage.

As Ahmadinejad's allies blasted U.S. foreign policy during an official rally attended by tens of thousands of schoolchildren bused in the for the event and government supporters, a leading reformist cleric and architect of the Islamic Revolution issued a provocative statement describing the storming of the U.S. mission in Tehran as a mistake.

"Considering the negative repercussions and the high sensitivity which was created among the American people and which still exists, it was not the right thing to do," Ayatollah Hossein Montazeri said in a statement posted to his website.
Photo hat tip Madyar

Iconic image

• Email to a friend • Article Search • •

Pamela Geller (Atlas Shrugs) on the Blogosphere

Stephen over at Stop the ACLU is conducting blogger interviews, asking a few questions about the blogosphere and me. It's a different kind of subject matter. I think you'll enjoy it.
Pamela Geller (Atlas Shrugs) on the Blogosphere
Here's an excerpt (read the whole thing)
You are considered as a leader in the conservative blogosphere. How do you feel leadership qualities are essential in making a difference in the political blogosphere?

Does anyone set out with such a goal? I did not. But I wanted to make a difference. I wanted to be heard and I thought my clarity would help me be heard, and I thought that the nature of my thinking was seldom being articulated and not in a forceful, passionate way. I speak for the smallest minority in the world: the individual. My political party is capitalism. I think the Constitution is as close to a religious document as you can get. America is the most noble experiment in human history: noble, moral, benevolent and successful. My goal at the outset was preserving the America I grew up in – fighting for the free, protecting and defending the individual’s rights against majority tyranny and minority plotting. And that is still my goal.

I don’t know if leadership qualities are essential in making a difference in the political blogosphere, but integrity is. And so is an uncompromising work ethic. You have to say what you mean and mean what you say. Walking the walk, talking the talk — at least that’s the requisite on the right blogs. The left has no morals, no ethics, no values. What is required on the left is viciousness. The more vicious, the more successful the blog. The left and right blogs are as different as night and day.

Did you intend to become a leader, or did it come naturally? How much responsibility comes with this role, and how serious do you take the role?

I did not intend to become a leader. I don’t know that I am. I certainly don’t see myself that way. The responsibility is to the work. Always. And despite what difficulties you might encounter, you stay true to yourself and what you believe, no matter what the cost.

I take the role of online journalist and alternative media outlet very seriously.

How has the blogosphere changed for the better since you first began? Do you consider yourself a pioneer?

I think I was late to the party with Atlas Shrugs. I started in February 2005. The blogs on the right were well established – Malkin, Powerline, Little Green Footballs before he turned traitor and defected. But I thought I had something more to say and so I jumped in.

I wanted and still want to help build this medium. If I help to pioneer that effort, I will die a happy blogger.

How has it changed for the worse?

Little Green balls is the easy and obvious answer. That blog was a touchstone for so many of us. When he tried to destroy my reputation in November 2007 for not bending to his will and denouncing members of the trans-atlantic counter jihad movement, I knew it might be was blog suicide. He was wrong, but he was king. My daily visitors went from 10,000 a day to 2,000. I was never linked by any of the big blogs ever again – Malkin, Instapundit, et al. Even when I broke big stories, like Obama’s campaign contributions from a Hamas refugee camp in Gaza.

But it was a valuable lesson. I came back without being part of the link chain or the blog clique. I built it back one reader by one reader. It’s better, of course. That way you are not slave to the link master.

Turning to the overall picture of the right blogosphere…. what has changed for the worse is the abandonment of the issue of Islamic supremacism by the big blogs — the most dangerous threat facing the West, more dangerous than Nazism, more insidious than communism and they won’t touch it. Of course Jihad Watch covers it comprehensively, but that’s what Spencer does. Islamic jihad is not a tangential issue. It is the defining conflict of our time.

What changes for the better and worse do you see in the near future for blogs?

Nothing will change for the left, they are smear machines. It’s what they do. It’s the currency they traffic in.

For the right blogs, the future’s so bright, I gotta wear shades. More and more people are flocking to the net in pursuit of the real news. They see that the mainstream media has become a corrupt activist media for the left. Americans feel betrayed by a media that did not vet Obama. They saw grammy and pop labeled racists and nazis because they didn’t want socialized medicine. People are waking up. It’s a very good time for us.

Right vs. Left, who is faring better in the blogosphere and why?

Moneywise, the left. They are well funded by Soros, moveon, media matters. But they are void of credibility, short on accuracy, big on invective. They traffic in smear. Very boring.

The objective of left wing blogs is to smear and destroy. Those blogs have become very sophisticated search and destroy machines. Alinsky ridicule is the MBO.

The right has created a new news media outlet. Alternative media is becoming as influential as talk radio. The objective of right wing blogs is to investigate and report the news the media won’t touch. And the right has done such a good job because it’s all low hanging fruit; no one else is doing it. ACORN, Rifqa Bary, Obamacare, the stimulus, the socialists and radicals in the White House ………. exposed by the blood, sweat and tears of right blogs.

Its been said conservative blogs seem to fare better when a liberal is in power? Have you seen this since Obama got elected?

Of course! Obama is destroying the country. And the media is in the tank for him.

The county forgets how destructive leftist policies are. Clinton, Carter, Obama ….disasters all.

Americans have short memories, and they get seduced by a media that functions as the propaganda arm of the Democrat party. They go to bed with hope and change, they wake up to Obama.

If the media operated as an honest agent, the Democrats would have gone the way of the KKK decades ago.

There seems to be a split in the conservative and moderate side of the Republican party. What are your predictions on the direction this will ultimately go?

“Moderate” is a euphemism for directionless, void of principles. You can’t sit on the fence in matters of life and death and political philosophy. You must be vigorous, fierce in the protection of individual rights, limited government, Constitutionalism, low taxes. Rugged individualism.

In any compromise between good and evil, evil profits. Enough with the RINOs. They had their shot. They routed the party – they are done, finished, cooked. McCain was the final nail in the coffin. The DIABLOs ought to switch parties. Olympia Snowe is our worst nightmare.

In the conservative blogosphere, do you see cliques that have developed? If so, can you expound a bit?

Of course, it is very cliquey and it has swept some blogs with inferior content to undeserved rank/position because of regular big blog linkage. But so what? If you work hard, stay focused, love what you do, you can be successful. Atlas is not part of any clique. Check my referrals. No big linkage, but my numbers are big.

I think the blog cliques are tired and their content is tired too. They all sound alike. They don’t have to work as hard and it shows — their ranking reflects yesterday. Tomorrow will look awfully different in the blogosphere.

Are their any new blogs without money backing like Brietbart’s that you see potentially becoming a major influence in the future or growing to more success?

Tip of the old hat to Breitbart, alternative media’s William Randolph Hearst

There is a lot of new, smart, ass kicking blogs in America and Europe too. The most interesting blogs are the international blogs like New Zeal and anti-jihad blogs like the Finnish Tundra Tabloids that are doing incredible work exposing the scoundrels on the Hill. New blogs like Brave New Commie, Vigilant Squirrel Brigade, and summer patriot, winter soldier offer a refreshing new perspective. But guys like Vanderleun, who have been around awhile, are still fresh, original and delish. And Oleg at The People's Cube, outstanding.

Do you see twitter and facebook expanding influence amongst bloggers?

Twitter had little effect, for me, until the Iranian bloodbath. Then it was essential. I saw it make a huge crack in a walled off dictatorship erected in a oppressive, brutal, censored society. It was a Gutenberg moment. I worry still about Persian Kiwi. When he/she went dark on twitter, he/she was never heard from again. Marching for freedom and dying for tweeting. Devastating. And Obama’s callous dismissal of those marching and dying for freedom is a stain on American international policy that we will not long live down.

The only benefit for bloggers from facebook and twitter is to hook your blog feeds to these social networks. When you post to your blog, it updates your status and goes out to all of your friends and followers who repost it. It builds readership. I never actually tweet or post FB status updates, but my blog does. And Facebook made a difference – I am maxing out on friends now, which is wild. 5,000 FB friends and I have like two friends in real life.

Do you ever see blogs becoming something lucrative or is this only for the very talented and lucky bloggers?

It’s tricky. My blog is not a money maker. I don’t do advertorial stuff ever. I have some small maverick advertisers, but Atlas is mostly reader supported. Yet if not for the blog, I would never have gotten a big book deal from Simon and Schuster or a regular gig at Newsmax or a radio segment on Jaz Mckay or opportunities to speak. So Atlas is the heart of everything I do. Atlas Shrugs comes first.

Newspapers are history. The future belongs to the blogs. I don’t know what the business model will look like, I don’t know how the blog business will monetize, but it is the future. It will happen.

There'a a lot more.

And check out his interview with Gateway Pundit here.

• Email to a friend • Article Search • •

Islamic Jew Hatred in Mumbai: They came for the Jews .... Eyes Gouged Out

In my extensive coverage of the savage Muslim attacks on the West in Mumbai, India, the obsession with targeting the small little Jewish Chabad house from the inception of the planning was shocking. The Jewish Chabad house was part of a larger attack on hotels and public buildings across Mumbai that resulted in the deaths of at least 166 people. But for the Muslim terrorists themselves, Nariman House was different. It was the only Jewish target, and the Muslim terrorists would be told by their central command in Pakistan that the lives of Jews were worth 50 times those of non-Jews. The organisers had sought it out with care. Their handlers would emphasize to them the importance of killing Jews.
The Times has done an excellent job on focusing on the Muslim obsession with killing and torturing the Jews -- something I picked up on right away and covered extensively (I was the one of the few who reported the sexual mutilation of the the Rabbi and his wife).
Noteworthy are two people who worked in the house: Sandra, a Catholic Mumbaikar who previously worked as a private cook and a masseuse and started with the Holtzbergs in 2003. She was the nanny who saved the baby Moshe. And Jackie, a Muslim from Assam, was hired as a cook in 2006 after meeting Gabi at a sports club where he worked. Since the siege, The Sunday Times has learnt, suspicions have arisen that he may have been implicated.

The terrible hatred of the Jews is instilled in Muslims from birth. The attacks in Mumbai were the manifestation of that hate.

Mumbai terror attacks: And then they came for the Jews
Last November, more than 150 people were killed by terrorists in Mumbai. One target was a centre run by this young Jewish couple, who were murdered and perhaps tortured; miraculously, their toddler son escaped.
All the hostages had been shot, he said. Some had multiple bullet wounds. But there was more. Two of the rabbis had broken bones. The skull of one of the victims had caved in, as sometimes happens when somebody is shot in the head at close range with a rifle, except the man had not been shot in the head. The two female visitors, Orpaz and Rabinovich, were found bound with telephone cord and lying next to each other on a fourth-floor bed. One of the hostages had bruising all over her body, which the man, who is not a pathologist, said was consistent with being hit by a blunt object. There was a large cut on her thigh. And one of her eyes was out of its orbit and lying on her cheek.

Please read the whole thing.
Previously at Atlas: COMPLETE VIDEO Islamic Terror in Mumbai: Actual Dispatches: "This is a struggle between Islam and Unbelievers, We are the People God has Chosen to Defend Against the Unbelievers"
Islam in Action: Mumbai Terror, the Video
The chilling words of the Muslim Mumbai killers recorded during their murder spree: "Keep killing, keep killing, the dogs.' "Insh'Allah" 'The manner of your death will instill fear in the unbelievers. This is a battle between Islam and the unbelievers"
MUMBAI: MUSLIM NAZIS TOLD "KILL THEM", "Gunshots than rang out, followed by cheers" 1/7/09
MUMBAI: MUSLIM TERRORIST ADMITS ISLAM'S PRIME TARGET: THE JEWS
MUSLIM TERRORISTS IN MUMBAI SEXUALLY MUTILATED THEIR NON-MUSLIM VICTIMS, RABBI AND PREGNANT WIFE
INDIA: Protesting Jihad at the UN
HOLY WAR: AL QAEDA LINKED TO THE BATTLE IN MUMBAI
Oh... the humanity
IT'S WAR
MUMBAI: MUSLIMS MERCILESSLY TORTURED THE VICTIMS, JEWS GOT IT THE WORST
THE HORRORS OF ISLAM
'Shoot them, they're sitting ducks!' but they just didn't shoot back."
ISLAMIC WEBSITES REJOICE OVER MUMBAI ATTACKS

• Email to a friend • Article Search • •

More Recent Articles

Facebook Jihad on Rifqa Bary

Election Results: Overthrowing Obama, it's a rout UPDATE: CHRISTIE WINS!!! Blue Jersey Goes Red OOOORAH!

On Death Row: Muslim John Muhammad, aka the Beltway Sniper, in the mind of a jihadi

Atlas on Jaz McKay now ..........

Arab American Media on Rifqa Bary: "She's only 17 and she's dead either way"

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

Sweet Gypsey — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:57:49 GMT

"THIS WAS IN MY MAIL TODAY"

"Thank you for Your Time"

Good Morning Friends,

As I watched the President spinning his lies across China a thought occurred to me.

Remember when you were a kid and you went to the amusement park. They always had the game Whack-A-Mole. My oldest son used to love the game. He called it Whack-A-Mole-E.  If you remember, you would put a quarter into the machine, these little moles would pop their head out of the hole, and you would proceed to knock the hell out of em with this rubber mallet. Great game! In my humble opinion, better the Skee Ball.

Someone needs to event the game, Whack-A-Liar. Can you picture putting a quarter into the machine, (I guess today it would be a dollar), and instead of a mole popping his pointy little head up, it would be an elected official. With all of the electronic advancements we have achieved today, the official would spout his rhetoric. At which point you could proceed to Whack-A-Liar. Knock the hell out of him.

Picture Obama popping up and saying, "No Public Option." Whack!!!!!

Biden saying, "The Stimulus is working." Whack, Whack

Or Pelosi just popping up and opening her mouth. Whack, Whack, Whack, WHACK!!!!

In fairness it will be a non partisan game with lots of little "Whack-A-Liar" heads. Endless heads.

Think about it. The game would be invigorating, stress relieving, and would keep a fair amount of Americans out of the hospital due to stroke. They could actually act out their aggressions.

On a more serious note, one needs to ask the question, "What does the game Whack-A-Liar and our elected officials have in common? The answer, MONEY. Your money. It takes a dollar to play the game, and the official needs your dollar to feed his agenda. Your money allows both games to be played.

If things continue on present course, Americans are going to come to a cross road. The directional sign at the cross road is going to point in two directions. One direction is "Freedom", the other is "Socialism" The choice to be made is simple That in order to maintain Freedom we have to kill the Moles/Liars in power. We are going to come to the realization that there is only one way to rid ourselves of the beast. That there is no sword, no gun, no cannon available to stop them. I say that, but the Taliban and a nuke would not be out of the realm of thought, but that's for another conversation. The only weapon that Americans have is their MONEY. Some would say that the VOTE is a weapon, but to vote one liar out of office, and then replace him with another just ain't cutting it. So let's stick with MONEY as the weapon of choice. It is the true life blood of these guys. We all remember the first Tea Party, and we are now living through the second. Different time, but the SAME PRINCIPLE. Feeding the King. Feeding the President. Sound familiar? WHACK, WHACK, WHACK!

Money is the food that feeds the Moles/Liars. It is what keeps them alive, it is what they relie upon to sustain life.

The point is simple. The principle is sound. STOP FEEDING THE MOLES/LIARS, AND THEY WILL DIE.

I saw Bill Oriely interviewing a liberal last night. Sally somebody, the name is not important. This loon was calling for a 70% tax on the wealthy. Hello?? Is anyone home?? MORE FOOD! These idiots not only want to eat, but if allowed, they will GORGE. They will gorge until their belly's burst. They will strip the shelves bare, and leave America groveling in the dirt. Think I'm kidding? Look at our national debt. They are gorging as we speak.

To think that if I go out and bust my ass, risk it all, and make what is considered a WEALTHY living, that I am supposed to give 70% to the idiots in Washington. That's ludicrous. It is contrary to the principles that made America great. It is, to say the least, NOT AMERICAN. Call it what it what it really is, SOCIALISM!

So the next time you hear the words TAX REVOLT, don't dismiss the words as the words of a crazy person. They may become the words of TRUE Americans? Think about the meaning of the words, but more so, think about the potential effect! Then ask yourself the question, is it a viable option? WHACK,WHACK,WHACK!! You damn tooting it is.
   Our Forefathers had the balls to say the words. "Taxation without representation." The question is, when the time comes, will we?? Or, will the sand be a pillow for our heads?

B.

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

Sweet Gypsey — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:58:34 GMT

"THANK YOU MARCO"

"PLEASE TAKE THE TIME TO READ, THANK YOU"

This Sunday at 9 pm Eastern time, FOX news, is going to air a very important documentary about Barack Obama.

The report will go back to Obama's earlier days, showing even then his close ties to radical Marxist professors, friends, spiritual advisers, etc. It will also reveal details about his ties to Rev. Wright for +20 years, i.e. how he was participating with this man, and not for the reasons he states!

The report has uncovered even more of Obama's radical past that is already known, and we will see things that no one in the media is willing to put out there. It will be a telecast to remember, for sure.

Mark your calendars and pass this on to everyone you know: Sunday night, 8 P M . CT ; 9 P M ET. Democrat or Republican, this report will open your eyes to how YOUR country is being sold down the road to Totalitarian Socialism. If you care about the direction our beloved country is being taken, pass this notice on to everyone you know...

It may be that Fox has been holding this information back due to the sensitivity of it and out of courtesy. But, Obama has taken on Fox and it appears they are ready to spill the ugly beans of truth about the background of this individual who has had an extremely radical past.

FORGET ABOUT WHETHER YOU CONSIDER YOURSELF A DEMOCRAT OR A REPUBLICAN; IN THE END, WHAT MATTERS IS THAT WE ARE ALL AMERICANS AND THUS OUR FATE IS THE SAME!

The contents of this program could very well be why the White House has been attempting to discredit FOX News lately. The repercussions from this telecast could be history-making, as one of the two, either Obama or FOX News, will eventually go down after this airs...!

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

Sweet Gypsey — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:59:42 GMT

"THIS WAS DROPPED IN THE MAIL LATE LAST NIGHT"

"PLEASE TAKE THE TIME TO READ, THANK YOU"

Dear Friends,

I was glancing at the Drudge report this morning, and picked up on the story that UCLA is going to have to raise it's tuition due to the simple fact that the state of California is going bankrupt. Thus a lack of funding to the instituion with the obvious results being a tuition hike. A fairly hefty one at that, 25%. Sounds almost like a tax increase??

Sara Bane, an economics graduate student, is quoted in her plea to the UCLA board saying, "You are jeopardizing California's future."

My first thought was a basic one. If this young lady is in grad school studying economic's, and doesn't have enough sense to realize that maybe California, (with it's massive entitlement programs, environmental stiflement, and high taxes), is in fact jeopardizing its future. Not by limiting education, but by endorsing stupidity through it's various economic outlays Maybe Sara should take Basket Weaving as her new discipline. At least she would be producing something?? Gaining a skill, or If all else fails she could apply for a job with the Obama administration? I have no clue what the Grad program is teaching its young and brightest, but it sure isn't basic economic principles. Not to mention basic common sense.

So what does UCLA California and Healthcare have in common? Don't ask Sara! She can't answer the question? She has no clue. I mean she really has NO clue.

Health care needs reform. On this we all agree. Simply put, cost's need to come down without a decrease in benefits. The talking points need no explanation. We have heard them all. Lets not be fooled. The goal can be achieved, but not with the reforms that are currently on the table. Not even close.

But here's the bigger question. Why are we, the United States of America, traveling the same road as California? Why are we bankrupting our nation with the same idiotic actions? Massive entitlement programs, an environmental agenda that will all but cripple business. Not to mention the increase in costs and the taxes that will insue. Taxes that will land a final blow for any type of sustained recovery. Recovery? Hell these idiots are going to spiral us into a second dip of the recession that we are currently enduring. A few more entitlements, a couple trillion more in debt, along with the increased taxes, and " Wow Bob what's behind door number 2?" Surprise Bob, its the "NEXT GREAT DEPRESSION."

Sara, take a wild guess as to what's going to happen to your tuition then? THINK HARD girl.

Here's the deal Sara. Like California you are dumb as a stump!!

Whereas I don't think Obama and crew are quite  as dumb. In fact I think this bunch is very very smart. Smart enough to know that if they can bankrupt the nation, and that the only thing left for the citizens to cling to will be the Government. Their newly defined government. After all, this is the goal as defined by their actions to date. Health Care is just one of the means to a very nasty end. Just one part of what appears to be a very well thought out plan for control.

What's the bottom line? California is going to go bankrupt mostly because of the will of its people. From what I have heard and read, most of the policies are based on their wishes and thought process. Reap what you sow. Self inflicted bankruptcy. Blatant stupidity. Wouldn't want to be you. Fix your own mess California. You see your increased tuition is the same as what will be Americas increased taxes. Its all and the same result.

Whereas, "We The People" are being led down this same road, not of our free will, but by a man (or his handlers) who are using the downfall of California, as a blueprint to take control of America. By imposing the same defeatist policies that will soon befall a once great state, and jabbing them into the heart of our beloved country. All in an effort to inflict a radical elitist philosophy that the majority of Americans want no part of. The key word in the last sentence is MAJORITY.

So here is the deal as I see it Sara. Change your major, or grow a brain.

America has something to do too. We've got to stop the madness, and get rid of the economic tsunami that is being thrust upon us. We need to rip up the radicals blueprint, but more importantly, we have to cast out the man and those around him who are trying to insert their will on an unwilling people. Or else, we will find ourselves in the same predicament as you, and UCLA. America still has time to correct the course, whereas I think California may be staring into the abyss.

I don't like the word abyss.

B.
.

******************************************************************************************************************

Why would anyone with a brain spend TWO and a HALF TRILLION dollars to insure 12 million people? My calculator isn't up to date and won't give me the cost per person, but I can tell you it tisn't good.

This bill isn't about insurance. No man, it is about control. Pure and simple. Control that Americans need to stop, and stop now before it is to late. If they can create the second generation financial meltdown, then they are going to bill the government as the ONLY savior of it's people. The white horse they will ride to the rescue on may only have one leg, but the rest will be history. A very sad history for our children, our grandchildren, and generations far removed.

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

Sweet Gypsey — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:59:47 GMT

"THIS WAS DROPPED IN THE MAIL LATE LAST NIGHT"

"PLEASE TAKE THE TIME TO READ, THANK YOU"

Dear Friends,

I was glancing at the Drudge report this morning, and picked up on the story that UCLA is going to have to raise it's tuition due to the simple fact that the state of California is going bankrupt. Thus a lack of funding to the instituion with the obvious results being a tuition hike. A fairly hefty one at that, 25%. Sounds almost like a tax increase??

Sara Bane, an economics graduate student, is quoted in her plea to the UCLA board saying, "You are jeopardizing California's future."

My first thought was a basic one. If this young lady is in grad school studying economic's, and doesn't have enough sense to realize that maybe California, (with it's massive entitlement programs, environmental stiflement, and high taxes), is in fact jeopardizing its future. Not by limiting education, but by endorsing stupidity through it's various economic outlays Maybe Sara should take Basket Weaving as her new discipline. At least she would be producing something?? Gaining a skill, or If all else fails she could apply for a job with the Obama administration? I have no clue what the Grad program is teaching its young and brightest, but it sure isn't basic economic principles. Not to mention basic common sense.

So what does UCLA California and Healthcare have in common? Don't ask Sara! She can't answer the question? She has no clue. I mean she really has NO clue.

Health care needs reform. On this we all agree. Simply put, cost's need to come down without a decrease in benefits. The talking points need no explanation. We have heard them all. Lets not be fooled. The goal can be achieved, but not with the reforms that are currently on the table. Not even close.

But here's the bigger question. Why are we, the United States of America, traveling the same road as California? Why are we bankrupting our nation with the same idiotic actions? Massive entitlement programs, an environmental agenda that will all but cripple business. Not to mention the increase in costs and the taxes that will insue. Taxes that will land a final blow for any type of sustained recovery. Recovery? Hell these idiots are going to spiral us into a second dip of the recession that we are currently enduring. A few more entitlements, a couple trillion more in debt, along with the increased taxes, and " Wow Bob what's behind door number 2?" Surprise Bob, its the "NEXT GREAT DEPRESSION."

Sara, take a wild guess as to what's going to happen to your tuition then? THINK HARD girl.

Here's the deal Sara. Like California you are dumb as a stump!!

Whereas I don't think Obama and crew are quite  as dumb. In fact I think this bunch is very very smart. Smart enough to know that if they can bankrupt the nation, and that the only thing left for the citizens to cling to will be the Government. Their newly defined government. After all, this is the goal as defined by their actions to date. Health Care is just one of the means to a very nasty end. Just one part of what appears to be a very well thought out plan for control.

What's the bottom line? California is going to go bankrupt mostly because of the will of its people. From what I have heard and read, most of the policies are based on their wishes and thought process. Reap what you sow. Self inflicted bankruptcy. Blatant stupidity. Wouldn't want to be you. Fix your own mess California. You see your increased tuition is the same as what will be Americas increased taxes. Its all and the same result.

Whereas, "We The People" are being led down this same road, not of our free will, but by a man (or his handlers) who are using the downfall of California, as a blueprint to take control of America. By imposing the same defeatist policies that will soon befall a once great state, and jabbing them into the heart of our beloved country. All in an effort to inflict a radical elitist philosophy that the majority of Americans want no part of. The key word in the last sentence is MAJORITY.

So here is the deal as I see it Sara. Change your major, or grow a brain.

America has something to do too. We've got to stop the madness, and get rid of the economic tsunami that is being thrust upon us. We need to rip up the radicals blueprint, but more importantly, we have to cast out the man and those around him who are trying to insert their will on an unwilling people. Or else, we will find ourselves in the same predicament as you, and UCLA. America still has time to correct the course, whereas I think California may be staring into the abyss.

I don't like the word abyss.

B.
.

******************************************************************************************************************

Why would anyone with a brain spend TWO and a HALF TRILLION dollars to insure 12 million people? My calculator isn't up to date and won't give me the cost per person, but I can tell you it tisn't good.

This bill isn't about insurance. No man, it is about control. Pure and simple. Control that Americans need to stop, and stop now before it is to late. If they can create the second generation financial meltdown, then they are going to bill the government as the ONLY savior of it's people. The white horse they will ride to the rescue on may only have one leg, but the rest will be history. A very sad history for our children, our grandchildren, and generations far removed.

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

Dawg — Thu, 26 Nov 2009 22:32:51 GMT

Israel better do something quick, because Iran is going to gather as much material and intel to use as they can before Israel has no other choice than to strike. The longer they wait, the more Iran will have to be able to wreak havoc. Except this time instead of the enemy lighting their oil rigs on fire, they will be setting off all the nukes they have.

Whose side is Obama on? He is a muslim, I will give you three guesses.

Whose side will America be on? I stand with Israel.

RE: Will the Israelis bomb Iran?/Who's side will Obama be on?/Who's side will American be on?

American Patriot — Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:06:04 GMT

The Anti-Choice Liberal’s in Charge
School choice…not if you are liberal.

Choice to not join a union…..not if you are liberal…

Choice of privacy….not if you are liberal.

Choice to pick your doctor and medical care…not if you are liberal.

Choice to kill your baby…..you bet because the liberals in power wants to make sure that is the one choice that only women can have.”

Of course I can always choose to be generous Liberal Style:
Today I saw a homeless man. I guess I could have stopped and given him a few dollars but I think instead I will steal somebody's car and give it to him instead. I know it is unfair for him to be poor and the other guy to have so much.

We have much to learn from the Pelosi-Obama Administration. It's clear who wears the pants in that relationship.

Our Ditherer-in-Chief continues to 'vote present'

Our "Ditherer-in-Chief" continuing to do little more than "vote present" in making a final decision on Afghanistan is complicating the Afghan campaign and significantly affecting our war effort. It seems our inexperienced, unprepared-for-office, president fails to understand that there is a cost of dithering:

General Stanley McChrystal's assessment and force-requirement studies were largely complete by the beginning of August. The White House has stated that the president will not be announcing a decision until the end of November at the earliest. White House officials claim that the delay does not affect the movement of U.S. forces or our prospects for military success next year. These claims are inaccurate. The delay in White House decision-making is protracting and complicating the campaign in Afghanistan and has reduced General McChrystal's ability to prepare for and conduct decisive operations next year.